IEEE INFOCOM 2016 - The 35th Annual IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications 2016
DOI: 10.1109/infocom.2016.7524579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social learning networks: Efficiency optimization for MOOC forums

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notice also that β is lowest while α is highest in comp. This observation is consistent with the fact that in humanities courses like comp the discussions in each thread will tend to be longer [2], leading to more new activity notifications, while in engineering courses like ml and algo we would expect learners to more directly answer each other's questions, leading to more explicit replies.…”
Section: Model Analyticssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Notice also that β is lowest while α is highest in comp. This observation is consistent with the fact that in humanities courses like comp the discussions in each thread will tend to be longer [2], leading to more new activity notifications, while in engineering courses like ml and algo we would expect learners to more directly answer each other's questions, leading to more explicit replies.…”
Section: Model Analyticssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…where µ u,k denotes the background posting rate of learner u on topic k. Separating the initial posts in threads from future posts in this way enables us to model learners' knowledge seeking (i.e., starting threads) and knowledge disseminating (i.e., posting responses in threads) behavior [2], through the background (µ u,k ) and excitation levels (a u,k ), respectively.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The learners may take advantage of these courses, as well as the forums, based on their current needs and their reasons for participating. The increasing interest in the evaluation of MOOC discussion groups, has led researchers to apply a number of tools to assess their quality and efficiency (Brinton et al, ; Lucas, Gunawardena, & Moreira, ) and to tease out key aspects of the interaction that can lead to improvements in online learning environments. To this aim, the current research used a content analysis tool and contributed to further understanding online learners who participate in course forums.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, in Ref. the users' benefit is modeled with general utility functions. Authors evaluate the efficiency of the discussion forums in four MOOC courses, in which they see the potential gains that can be obtained through optimization, proposing for further work to design mechanisms to enforce the optimized networks in practice.…”
Section: Learning Analytics: Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%