Social Media and Political Agenda Setting

Abstract

What is the role of social media in political agenda setting? Digital platforms have reduced the gatekeeping power of traditional media and, potentially, they have increased the capacity of various kinds of actors to shape the agenda. We study this question in the Swiss context by examining the connections between three agendas: the traditional media agenda, the social media agenda of parties, and the social media agenda of politicians. Specifically, we validate and apply supervised machine learning classifiers to categorize 2.78 million articles published in 84 newspapers, 6,500 tweets posted on official party accounts, and 210,000 tweets posted by politicians on their own accounts from January 2018 until December 2019. We first use the classifier to measure the salience of the four most relevant issues of the period: the environment, Europe, gender equality, and immigration. Then, using a vector autoregression (VAR) approach, we analyze the relationship between the three agendas. Results show that not only do the traditional media agenda, the social media agenda of parties, and the social media agenda of politicians influence one another but, overall, no agenda leads the others more than it is led by them. There is one important exception: for the environment issue, the social media agenda of parties is more predictive of the traditional media agenda than vice-versa. These findings underscore how closely different agendas are tied together, but also show that advocacy campaigns may play an important role in both constraining and enabling parties to push their specific agendas.

How the refugee crisis and radical right parties shape party competition on immigration

“…This implies that beyond the long-term strategies outlined in party manifestos, parties also react to their competitors within days or weeks in their press releases. This supports similar research on short-term agenda setting on social media (Gilardi et al, 2021). Notably, our results hold for all three time periods, i.e.…”

Social Media and Policy Responses to the COVID‐19 Pandemic in Switzerland

“…Fazekas et al (2021) argue that politicians can use Twitter to influence the public agenda but, in the context of European parliament elections, find that most political actors did not engage with the public specifically on EU issues. Gilardi et al (2021) analyze the traditional media agenda, the social media agenda of parties, and the social media agenda of politicians in the Swiss context. This study finds that the three agendas are strongly interconnected and no agenda clearly leads the others.…”

Digital Transformations of the Public Arena

“…Traditional news organizations pick up stories from digital or partisan news outlets; journalists, political elites, and organizations listen closely and react to attention shifts on social media platforms (Karpf 2016;McGregor 2020); while social media users comment and contest media coverage and the statements of political elites (Jungherr 2014). It comes as no surprise then to find news and political agendas to be more interconnected (Gilardi et al 2021;Harder et al 2017;Neuman et al 2014;Posegga & Jungherr 2019;Vargo et al 2018). But the shaping of attention is complicated and causal influences remain opaque as researchers often only have access to incomplete or partial snapshots of the attention space or of visibility in different areas of the public arena, which makes it difficult to pinpoint the structure of influence (Jungherr et al 2019a).…”