2016
DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2016.1227000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Media Social Capital, Offline Social Capital, and Citizenship: Exploring Asymmetrical Social Capital Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
76
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
5
76
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Bimber proposes three distinct but related theoretical explanations: organizationprompted behavior (traditional forms of participation that are enhanced, and often encouraged by the adaption of organized and formally structured initiatives to digital environments), socially prompted behavior (civic behavior based on awareness that other people are performing similar activities), and self-prompted behavior (actions that are based on personal initiative as a result of exposure to information rather than direct encouragement from organizations or other users, facilitated especially by access to a plethora of social media and the resultant lowered costs of such actions). The subsequent articles included in this special issue are bound around this theoretical approach focusing on incentives or/and encouragement (Gil de Zuniga, Barnidge, & Scherman, 2017;Lilleker & Koc-Michalska, 2017;Vaccari, 2017) or how distinct forms of organization-prompted participation (Gibson, Greffet, & Cantijoch, 2017) and socially prompted participation (Zhu, Skoric, & Shen, 2017) take place in a digital media environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bimber proposes three distinct but related theoretical explanations: organizationprompted behavior (traditional forms of participation that are enhanced, and often encouraged by the adaption of organized and formally structured initiatives to digital environments), socially prompted behavior (civic behavior based on awareness that other people are performing similar activities), and self-prompted behavior (actions that are based on personal initiative as a result of exposure to information rather than direct encouragement from organizations or other users, facilitated especially by access to a plethora of social media and the resultant lowered costs of such actions). The subsequent articles included in this special issue are bound around this theoretical approach focusing on incentives or/and encouragement (Gil de Zuniga, Barnidge, & Scherman, 2017;Lilleker & Koc-Michalska, 2017;Vaccari, 2017) or how distinct forms of organization-prompted participation (Gibson, Greffet, & Cantijoch, 2017) and socially prompted participation (Zhu, Skoric, & Shen, 2017) take place in a digital media environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…de Zúñiga et al [36] argue that the processes of obtaining and using social capital on social media differs in nature from those relating to social capital in face-to-face settings. They argue that "social media has changed the structure and nature of social connection, and therefore that they may alter the distribution and nature of social capital embedded in those social relationships" [36, p. 45].…”
Section: Social Media As a Parliamentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La fortaleza de los vínculos creados por el capital social de las redes sociales en línea permite que el debate sobre los asuntos que afectan a determinadas comunidades trascienda el espacio digital e involucre a nuevos actores comprometidos con la discusión pública (Gil de Zúñiga et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discusión Y Conclusionesunclassified