2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/hri.2016.7451802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social robots in educational institutions they came to stay: Introducing, evaluating, and securing social robots in daily education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The professional staff also noticed that pupils showed more sustained interest and greater concentration when NAO was used than in similar teaching settings without the robot. This finding confirms laboratory research conducted by Kirstein and Risager (2016). Some autistic pupils can perform an activity for a longer time than with nondigital materials and with a teacher as instructor.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The professional staff also noticed that pupils showed more sustained interest and greater concentration when NAO was used than in similar teaching settings without the robot. This finding confirms laboratory research conducted by Kirstein and Risager (2016). Some autistic pupils can perform an activity for a longer time than with nondigital materials and with a teacher as instructor.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…• The increasing number of social robots interacting with children (e.g., [76,81]) demands analysis of building trust in CRI. Some researchers already work on factors affecting trust for adults [30].…”
Section: Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social robots are increasingly popular as Emotional Support (ES) actors in youth-care programs for children (e.g., in hospitals [Jeong et al, 2015, Moerman and Jansens, 2021, Meghdari et al, 2016, schools [Kirstein andRisager, 2016, Belpaeme et al, 2018], and youth-care centers [Saldien et al, 2010, Huijnen et al, 2016). Yet, it is still unclear which role the social robot should entail and what a fulfilling child-robot relationship looks like in this domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%