1980
DOI: 10.2307/1170298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Role-Taking: A Review of the Constructs, Measures, and Measurement Properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The level of SPT was also found to have good internal consistency in the current sample (Cronbach alpha=0.83). Research indicates that the INS measures a distinct domain apart from IQ and demonstrates adequate internal and external validity (Enright and Lapsley 1980;Yeates et al 1991). The INS has been reported to correlate with indices of social status (r=0.58 for girls and 0.66 for boys) and behavior problems (r=−0.17 for girls and −0.33 for boys) (Yeates et al 1991).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level of SPT was also found to have good internal consistency in the current sample (Cronbach alpha=0.83). Research indicates that the INS measures a distinct domain apart from IQ and demonstrates adequate internal and external validity (Enright and Lapsley 1980;Yeates et al 1991). The INS has been reported to correlate with indices of social status (r=0.58 for girls and 0.66 for boys) and behavior problems (r=−0.17 for girls and −0.33 for boys) (Yeates et al 1991).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social perspective taking, sometimes referred to as “role-taking,” involves the ability to understand another person’s thoughts or feelings from that person’s point of view (Enright & Lapsley 1980). Social perspective taking is comprised of cognitive and affective perspective taking (e.g., Enright & Lapsley 1980).…”
Section: Social Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several investigators have attributed the inconsistent findings in the role-taking literature to the psychometric properties of role-taking measures and/or the as yet undifferentiated, and probably multidimensional, nature of the role-taking construct (Enright & Lapsley 1980;Hudson 1978;Kurdek 1978;Rubin 1978;Urberg & Docherty 1976). Two conclusions drawn from this previous research constitute the rationale for the present study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%