“…Social & health care BY RESPONDENT GROUP: + Robots are accepted in work tasks related to hospital by general public [17]. Patients accepted robots in reflexology [27] and brain injury rehabilitation [8], and professionals in surgery [41, 90] -Professionals [8,51] and elderly respondents [6] questioned the necessity and feasibility of robots in social and health care fields -Robots were not well accepted by care professionals [78,93] or as a robot bathtub by the elderly respondents [6] AS EQUIPMENT OR AS A WORKER: + Robots were accepted as substitutes for tools or equipment [2,76,69] and coworkers [90], and even referred to as a social actor or a citizen [ -Robots were perceived more as toys or entertainment than as sources of security by elderly respondents [19,71] HEALTH OUTCOMES: + Robots were perceived as having a positive effect on patients in physiotherapy and rehabilitation [22,[31][32]34], and physiotherapists accepted their use in clinics and homes [53] BY ROBOT TYPE: + Telepresence robots were perceived as having positive effects on patient care [60,75] and communication [63,79] and ranked at least as desirable as telephones [7,47] + Assistive robots were well accepted by the elderly people [19,39,46,52,71], robot bathtubs by professionals [6] excessive control, hacking of the systems, and unemployment [12] Education + Robots are accepted in work tasks related to education [17] + Attitudes toward educational robots were neutral and robots could be imagined in subjects such as science, technology, engineering, and mathematics [74] -Respondents were reluctant to participate in teaching provided by a robot and could not imagine a robot in subjects such as social sciences or art…”