2012
DOI: 10.4301/s1807-17752012000300003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Software Process Assessment and Improvement Using Multicriteria Decision Aiding - Constructivist

Abstract: Software process improvement and software process assessment have received special attention since the 1980s. Some models have been created, but these models rest on a normative approach, where the decision-maker's participation in a software organization is limited to understanding which process is more relevant to each organization. The proposal of this work is to present the MCDA-C as a constructivist methodology for software process improvement and assessment. The methodology makes it possible to visualize… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each of these perspectives carries with it a set of assumptions that directly affects the modus operandi with the methodologies of process management that are developed and implemented in organizations, because they act as lenses through which certain properties are observed and others disregarded (Melão and Pidd, ; Brunswik et al ., ; Karlsson, ; Ensslin et al ., ).…”
Section: Methodological Framingmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each of these perspectives carries with it a set of assumptions that directly affects the modus operandi with the methodologies of process management that are developed and implemented in organizations, because they act as lenses through which certain properties are observed and others disregarded (Melão and Pidd, ; Brunswik et al ., ; Karlsson, ; Ensslin et al ., ).…”
Section: Methodological Framingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Thus, the approaches and their work assumptions are world views that act as filters in the eyes of researchers and consultants, making them see specific things and ignore others in the context in which they operate (Melão and Pidd, ; Leonardo Ensslin et al ., ).…”
Section: Methodological Framingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MCDA determines these criteria by means of a dialog process with the decision maker, whose steps are contextualization; determination of the primary evaluation elements (PEEs); construction of the concepts; and the construction of the hierarchical structure value (top down) until the candidate FPVs are reached. The term candidate FPV is used here to signify that these elements still need to pass other tests (e.g., essential, controllable, complete, measurable, operational, isolable, homogeneous, concise, and intelligible) (Ensslin et al., ).…”
Section: Construction Of the Logistics Performance Evaluation Model Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches and their work assumptions are world views that act as filters in the eyes of researchers and consultants, enabling them to see specific things and ignore others in the context in which they are operating (Melão and Pidd, 2000;Ensslin et al, 2012). According to Melão and Pidd (2000), the world view is a perspective on how to understand process management.…”
Section: Theoretical Framingmentioning
confidence: 99%