2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2006.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Software validation in metrology: A case study for a GUM-supporting software

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For several years, the authors have been involved in the evaluation of software products which implement the GUM [3,4,5]. Recently, three further software products were comparatively evaluated concerning GUM conformity.…”
Section: Motivation and Aimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For several years, the authors have been involved in the evaluation of software products which implement the GUM [3,4,5]. Recently, three further software products were comparatively evaluated concerning GUM conformity.…”
Section: Motivation and Aimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have analyzed most critical parts of the software from verification point of view. Following practice of PTB and NPL [3][4] we have defined the list of most important testable requirements with suitable test criteria for each item. We will follow the list in following sections and sub-sections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, when measuring equipment has become much more powerful and software dependant, questions regarding software performance in metrology have been raised demanding further concern and research to establish its current status (Cox and Harris, 2000;Goulding, 2003;Esward et al, 2003;Greif et al, 2006;Richter, 2006;Carbone et al, 2008;Habra, 2008;Liu et al, 2008). The same applies when simulation models are integrated in the metrology software to be used to preview the CMM behavior, which is the case of the Virtual Coordinate Measuring Machines (VCMM) (Phillips et al, 2002;Takamasu, 2002;Levin, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validity (Greif et al, 2006;Richter, 2006;Levin, 2008) is usually verified through a selected subset of tests until sufficient confidence is obtained that the model is valid for an intended application. For this reason, authors state: a simulation model of a complex system can only be an approximation to the actual system, regardless of how much effort is put into developing the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation