Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Background Phosphorus (P) fertilizer is usually applied in excess of plant requirement and accumulates in soils due to its strong adsorption, rapid precipitation and immobilisation into unavailable forms including organic moieties. As soils are complex and diverse chemical, biochemical and biological systems, strategies to access recalcitrant soil P are often inefficient, case specific and inconsistently applicable in different soils. Finding a near-universal or at least widely applicable solution to the inefficiency in agricultural P use by plants is an important unsolved problem that has been under investigation for more than half a century. Scope In this paper we critically review the strategies proposed for the remobilization of recalcitrant soil phosphorus for crops and pastures worldwide. We have additionally performed a meta-analysis of available soil 31 P-NMR data to establish the potential agronomic value of different stored P forms in agricultural soils. Conclusions Soil inorganic P stocks accounted on average for 1006 ± 115 kg ha −1 (57 ± 7%), while the monoester P pool accounted for 587 ± 32 kg ha −1 (33 ± 2%), indicating the huge potential for the future agronomic use of the soil legacy P. New impact driven research is needed in order to create solutions for the sustainable management of soil P stocks.
Background Phosphorus (P) fertilizer is usually applied in excess of plant requirement and accumulates in soils due to its strong adsorption, rapid precipitation and immobilisation into unavailable forms including organic moieties. As soils are complex and diverse chemical, biochemical and biological systems, strategies to access recalcitrant soil P are often inefficient, case specific and inconsistently applicable in different soils. Finding a near-universal or at least widely applicable solution to the inefficiency in agricultural P use by plants is an important unsolved problem that has been under investigation for more than half a century. Scope In this paper we critically review the strategies proposed for the remobilization of recalcitrant soil phosphorus for crops and pastures worldwide. We have additionally performed a meta-analysis of available soil 31 P-NMR data to establish the potential agronomic value of different stored P forms in agricultural soils. Conclusions Soil inorganic P stocks accounted on average for 1006 ± 115 kg ha −1 (57 ± 7%), while the monoester P pool accounted for 587 ± 32 kg ha −1 (33 ± 2%), indicating the huge potential for the future agronomic use of the soil legacy P. New impact driven research is needed in order to create solutions for the sustainable management of soil P stocks.
Table S1. Effect of summer and no-summer irrigation (I) and fertiliser (F) application on soil total nitrogen (mg kg -1 ) during three years of the experiment (mean ± standard error). P values of ANOVA are shown in bold when P < 0.05 and different letters indicate significant differences among treatments according to post-hoc Tukey's HSD test.
Phosphorus (P) is a central element to life on Earth. Living organisms are dependent on a persistent supply of P as it is crucially involved in most major metabolic processes, e.g. in energy transfer as adenosine triphosphate (ATP). Likewise, plants rely on P to secure energy production in photosynthesis (Smil 2000, Ruttenberg 2009). Therefore, the fundamental significance of P in agriculture and food production is beyond question.In nature, we can identify several P pools (Smil 2000, Ruttenberg 2009). The largest P reservoir in the lithosphere occurs in marine and freshwater sediments (about 800-4000 × 10 6 Mt P). The entire phytomass (terrestrial and marine; about 570-625 Mt P) amounts to over 90% of P stored in the totality of all living organisms. Gaseous compounds of P are not stable; therefore, only an insignificant amount (0.028 Mt P) exists in the atmosphere as dust and sea spray picked up by wind erosion. The flows of P between these reservoirs are slow (one cycle may take more than 1 million years), which is caused by the low solubility of phosphate in water and the lack of an airborne reservoir.In soils, P derives mainly from weathering of the primary mineral apatite (Schlesinger 1997). The average total P in soils ranges from 200 mg/kg (in older/highly weathered soils) to 800 mg/kg (in younger/less developed soils) (Cross and ABSTRACTPhosphorus (P) fertilization is commonly based on soil testing, for which a variety of different soil P extraction methods are in use. The aim of this study was to compare 14 soil P extraction methods in terms of their extraction yield and their relation to soil properties. Fifty contrasting agricultural topsoils were sampled from Austria and Germany. The soils were extracted with the following methods/extractants: H 2 O, CaCl 2 , LiCl, Olsen, Bray and Kurtz II (Bray II), Mehlich 3, calcium-acetate-lactate (CAL), iron oxide impregnated filter papers (Fe-oxide P i ), cation and anion exchange membranes (CAEM), acid ammonium oxalate, citrate-bicarbonate-dithionite, HCl, organic P and total P. The extracted P varied over three orders of magnitude and increased in the order H 2 O < CaCl 2 < LiCl < Fe-oxide P i < Olsen < CAL < CAEM < Mehlich 3 < Bray II < dithionite < organic P < HCl < oxalate < total P. This sequence is in accordance with previous studies and reflects different extraction mechanisms and P pools. The different extraction methods were generally well correlated, especially when P extraction was achieved by a similar mechanism. The soil properties most influential on P extractability were pH, carbonate content, texture as well as iron oxide content and crystallinity. Our results show that the different extraction methods extract distinct pools of soil P with strongly varying extractability, and that the extractability of a given pool may be influenced by different soil properties to different extents. If and how these relationships translate to plant P uptake requires further examination.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.