2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9987-7_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil Spatial Variability and Structural Reliability of Buried Networks Subjected to Earthquakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different methods of calculation can be used to study soil-structure interaction. For example, the finite element method has been used in numerous studies: Imanzadeh et al (2014) and Dubost et al (2011) studied soil-foundation interaction, Elachachi et al (2004Elachachi et al ( , 2011Elachachi et al ( , 2012 studied soil-pipe interactions, and foundation settlements on spatially random soil have been studied by Houy et al (2005), Fenton and Griffiths (2002). However, in order to simplify the soil-structure interaction, analytical approaches can be used (Deck and Singh 2012;Imanzadeh et al 2013a).…”
Section: Soil-shallow Foundation Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Different methods of calculation can be used to study soil-structure interaction. For example, the finite element method has been used in numerous studies: Imanzadeh et al (2014) and Dubost et al (2011) studied soil-foundation interaction, Elachachi et al (2004Elachachi et al ( , 2011Elachachi et al ( , 2012 studied soil-pipe interactions, and foundation settlements on spatially random soil have been studied by Houy et al (2005), Fenton and Griffiths (2002). However, in order to simplify the soil-structure interaction, analytical approaches can be used (Deck and Singh 2012;Imanzadeh et al 2013a).…”
Section: Soil-shallow Foundation Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In fact, recent developments on the static analysis beam are documented in the article by Grigoriu et al [19] and Griffiths et al [20]. Moreover, an art of view of probabilistic soil modeling has been established [21] and various constitutive models of soil-structure interaction based on the probabilistic approach have been developed [22][23][24]. Elachachi et al [22,23] used the theory of Vanmarcke in order to quantify the effect of different random parameters of soil on the pipe response, by taking into account two different models of soil (Winkler and the modified Vlassov model).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, an art of view of probabilistic soil modeling has been established [21] and various constitutive models of soil-structure interaction based on the probabilistic approach have been developed [22][23][24]. Elachachi et al [22,23] used the theory of Vanmarcke in order to quantify the effect of different random parameters of soil on the pipe response, by taking into account two different models of soil (Winkler and the modified Vlassov model). In this context Kazi Tani et al [25] presented stochastic finite difference method to study the linear response of pipeline resting on elastic perfectly plastic soil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effect on the nonlinear behavior of the soil on the beam response has been also studied [34][35][36][37]. Furthermore, a series of papers appeared in the literature [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55] where the effect of inherent random soil heterogeneity on beam response was assessed quantitatively and the heterogeneous soil characterized by its spatial properties (the mean, the coefficient of variation and the correlation length) is taken into account [38][39][40][41]. Grigoriu et al [42] analysed the response of beam on Winkler random soil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%