2021
DOI: 10.1109/tdmr.2021.3056054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solder Joint Reliability Assessment and Pad Size Studies of FO-WLP With Glass Substrate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The empirical formula for Coffin–Manson equivalent plastic strain model is shown in Equation (1): where is mean cycle to failure, C and η are empirical constants, and is the incremental equivalent plastic strain. For SAC solder joint, and are 0.235 and 1.75 [ 61 , 62 ].…”
Section: Finite Element Methods For Wlpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The empirical formula for Coffin–Manson equivalent plastic strain model is shown in Equation (1): where is mean cycle to failure, C and η are empirical constants, and is the incremental equivalent plastic strain. For SAC solder joint, and are 0.235 and 1.75 [ 61 , 62 ].…”
Section: Finite Element Methods For Wlpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where N f is mean cycle to failure, C and η are empirical constants, and ∆ε pl eq is the incremental equivalent plastic strain. For SAC solder joint, C and η are 0.235 and 1.75 [61,62].…”
Section: Finite Element Methods For Wlpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average plastic strain per cycle was symbolized by PS . The fatigue exponent and the ductility coefficient are denoted by M and U , respectively 28 , 29 . …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of WLP, the thermal loading failure usually occurs at the outermost diagonal solder ball of the package. This study uses five WLP test vehicles (TV: WLP1-5) [ 16 , 17 , 18 ] and one fan-out WLP (FO-WLP, [ 19 ]) for FEA model validation. The structure component sizes, materials, and mean-time-to-failure (MTTF) reliability life are shown in Table 1 , Table 2 and Table 3 [ 17 , 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Wlp Fea Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study uses five WLP test vehicles (TV: WLP1-5) [ 16 , 17 , 18 ] and one fan-out WLP (FO-WLP, [ 19 ]) for FEA model validation. The structure component sizes, materials, and mean-time-to-failure (MTTF) reliability life are shown in Table 1 , Table 2 and Table 3 [ 17 , 18 , 19 ]. This research uses these data to verify our simulation results.…”
Section: Wlp Fea Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%