2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10854-021-07146-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solution combustion synthesis of iron tungstate nanoparticles for photoelectrochemical water splitting towards oxygen evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimentally, we have determined the band gap energy by means of a Tauc analysis (see the inset of Figure ); therefore, the reported value should be assumed as the lower limit value of E g . We obtained E g = 2.00(5) eV, which is between the previously reported values. , This means that the calculated band gap energy is slightly underestimated, but the underestimation, 0.2 eV, is within typical differences between DFT and experiments. , However, this does not affect the determination of the pressure dependence of E g . In Figure , we present the electronic density of states, which shows that Fe states are the main contributors to the top of the valence band and hybridized W and O orbitals dominate the bottom of the conduction band.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Experimentally, we have determined the band gap energy by means of a Tauc analysis (see the inset of Figure ); therefore, the reported value should be assumed as the lower limit value of E g . We obtained E g = 2.00(5) eV, which is between the previously reported values. , This means that the calculated band gap energy is slightly underestimated, but the underestimation, 0.2 eV, is within typical differences between DFT and experiments. , However, this does not affect the determination of the pressure dependence of E g . In Figure , we present the electronic density of states, which shows that Fe states are the main contributors to the top of the valence band and hybridized W and O orbitals dominate the bottom of the conduction band.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“… 59 We obtained E g = 2.00(5) eV, which is between the previously reported values. 10 , 12 14 This means that the calculated band gap energy is slightly underestimated, but the underestimation, 0.2 eV, is within typical differences between DFT and experiments. 23 , 60 However, this does not affect the determination of the pressure dependence of E g .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations