Spiro-OMeTAD (2,2 0 ,7,7 0 -tetrakis[N,N-di(4-methoxyphenyl)amino]-9,9 0 -spirobifluorene, from now on simply Spiro) is the most used and applied hole-transporting material (HTM) in perovskite solar cells (PSCs). The reason is straightforward: after opportune formulation (i.e., addition of 4-tert-butylpyridine, tBP, and lithium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)-imide, LiTFSI, as dopants/additives), the planar PSCs normally achieve the highest power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) at lab scale (up to 24%). [1] However, this result is strongly overestimated when compared with the longterm stability of the device: it has been already largely proved by several works that the necessary doping of the organic material augments the hygroscopic character of the layer, thus favoring moisture uptake from the atmosphere and subsequent perovskite film decomposition. [2,3] Combined with its notable cost (nowadays slightly decreasing due to the presence of more producers on the market), [4,5] we can assert that Spiro is only a model/benchmark HTM useful for lab-scale PSC production and testing. This is a pity indeed, because it possesses all the properties required for a good performing HTM: the high glass transition temperature due to the Spiro-type bond, the smooth film morphology that it forms, the relative simple processing, the electrochemical stability, the optical transparency in the visible window, the amorphous nature, the optimal band alignment with the perovskite valence band, and the chemical compatibility with dopants. Despite these very promising properties therefore, the high costs and very low inherent hole conductivity hugely reduce the possible commercialization of Spiro-based PSCs and force scientists to identify new avenues for obtaining long-term stability and for simplifying device processing methods.