2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving dynamic multi-objective problems with a new prediction-based optimization algorithm

Abstract: This paper proposes a new dynamic multi-objective optimization algorithm by integrating a new fitting-based prediction (FBP) mechanism with regularity model-based multi-objective estimation of distribution algorithm (RM-MEDA) for multi-objective optimization in changing environments. The prediction-based reaction mechanism aims to generate high-quality population when changes occur, which includes three subpopulations for tracking the moving Pareto-optimal set effectively. The first subpopulation is created by… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We consider two measures of experimental comprehensiveness: the number of combinations and the range of each parameter. The number of examined 𝑛 𝑑 -𝜏 𝑑 pairings is varied in recent works including one [20,32], two [23,36], three [13,22,38,43] and five [21]. Only the recent work by Zhang et al [37] considers a more diverse set with six different frequency-severity pairings: 𝑛 𝑑 -𝜏 𝑑 = {5 βˆ’ 5, 5 βˆ’ 10, 5 βˆ’ 20, 10 βˆ’ 5, 10 βˆ’ 10, 10 βˆ’ 20}.…”
Section: Severity and Frequencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We consider two measures of experimental comprehensiveness: the number of combinations and the range of each parameter. The number of examined 𝑛 𝑑 -𝜏 𝑑 pairings is varied in recent works including one [20,32], two [23,36], three [13,22,38,43] and five [21]. Only the recent work by Zhang et al [37] considers a more diverse set with six different frequency-severity pairings: 𝑛 𝑑 -𝜏 𝑑 = {5 βˆ’ 5, 5 βˆ’ 10, 5 βˆ’ 20, 10 βˆ’ 5, 10 βˆ’ 10, 10 βˆ’ 20}.…”
Section: Severity and Frequencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the principal benchmark dynamic multi-objective optimization problems (DMOPs) were defined nearly two decades ago by Farina et al [12]. Since then, a plethora of benchmark problems have been proposed [8,13,17,19,20,22,32,33,[36][37][38], allowing for the testing of different characteristics of real world systems in a controllable environment. Dynamic Optimization Problem (DOP) generators such as Moving Peaks [4,36] and the Dynamic XOR [35] and others are well-known single-objective environments in which the difficulty of a problem instance can be controlled by increasing the number of peaks or bits respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In predictive approaches, Miao et al [9] enhanced the accuracy of predicting the movement location of PS by clustering the population into multiple delegate groups using a proposed strategy. They also introduced a multidirectional prediction strategy to enhance the performance of the Evolutionary Algorithm (EA) in addressing DMOPs [10] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For fuzzy MONLP situations, Osman and El-Banna [29] proposed a qualitative analysis and stability. There are many researchers who have developed MODP (for instance, Moghaddam and Ghoseiri [30]; Muruganantham et al [31]; Li et al [32]; Deng et al [33]; Besheli et al [34]; Peraza et al [35]; Azevedo et al [36]; Ni et al [37]; Wu et al [38]; Liu et al [39]; Zou et al [40]; and Zhang et al [41]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%