1996
DOI: 10.1109/2945.489384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving geometric constraints by homotopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the current node N is a leaf in the tree then it is a well-constrained problem that cannot be decomposed further. Solve N with numerical computation methods [12,21,27]. …”
Section: Merge Bi-connected and Tri-connected Constraint Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the current node N is a leaf in the tree then it is a well-constrained problem that cannot be decomposed further. Solve N with numerical computation methods [12,21,27]. …”
Section: Merge Bi-connected and Tri-connected Constraint Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are four major approaches to geometric constraint solving: the numerical approach [12,21,27], the symbolic computation approach [7,19], the rule-based approach [2,6,20,29] and the graph-based approach [3,4,14,16,23,24,26]. This paper will focus on using graph algorithms to decompose a large constraint problem into smaller ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subdivision methods [15,6] provide all the solutions but the number of boxes to be explored can be huge. In algebraic approaches, homotopy methods have been successfully studied in this area [3,11] but only for small size problems. Indeed, the number of homotopy paths to follow grows exponentially with the number of constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the number of homotopy paths to follow grows exponentially with the number of constraints. In [11] it is proposed to use the sketch to define a parameter-homotopy. A sole path is followed but a sole solution is obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application to the Elbow Joint Metaballs paradigm was chosen here to build our model by making a gaussian sum of implicit functions that represent our ossification centers like local morphogenetic fields controlled by a few parameters.The articulation to model is composed of three bones epiphyses : the distal region of humerus, the radius head, and the ulna. An homotopy process [4] for mesh constructing implies a progressive modelling from an initial state where each element is collapsed into a simple shape (sphere) with a known mesh for each of the three bone extremities. Then the parameters variations imply a simulated morphogenesis until an adult final stage.…”
Section: Modelling and Segmentation Of Osteo-articular Shapesmentioning
confidence: 99%