2015
DOI: 10.1609/icaps.v25i1.13703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving Large-Scale Planning Problems by Decomposition and Macro Generation

Abstract: Large-scale classical planning problems such as factory as- sembly problems pose a significant challenge for domain- independent planners. We propose a macro-based planner which automatically identifies subproblems, generate macros from subplans and integrate the subplans by solving the whole augmented problem. We show experimentally that our approach can be used to solve large problem instances that are beyond the reach of current state-of-the-art satisficing plan- ners.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, the same authors propose an approach for generating macros for ADL domain models, that includes PDDL features that are rarely supported by more traditional methods [Hofmann et al, 2020]. CAP [Asai and Fukunaga, 2015] exploits component abstraction, that allows to cluster together similar objects (introduced by MacroFF), for generating sub-goal specific macros. In other words, CAP divides complex planning problems into independent sub-problems by abstracting the components of the original problem.…”
Section: Macro-operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, the same authors propose an approach for generating macros for ADL domain models, that includes PDDL features that are rarely supported by more traditional methods [Hofmann et al, 2020]. CAP [Asai and Fukunaga, 2015] exploits component abstraction, that allows to cluster together similar objects (introduced by MacroFF), for generating sub-goal specific macros. In other words, CAP divides complex planning problems into independent sub-problems by abstracting the components of the original problem.…”
Section: Macro-operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, the same authors propose an approach for generating macros for ADL domain models, that includes PDDL features that are rarely supported by more traditional methods (Hofmann et al, 2020). CAP (Asai & Fukunaga, 2015) exploits component abstraction, that allows to cluster together similar objects (introduced by MacroFF), for generating sub-goal specific macros. In other words, CAP divides complex planning problems into independent subproblems by abstracting the components of the original problem.…”
Section: Macro-operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2020). CAP (Asai & Fukunaga, 2015) exploits component abstraction, that allows to cluster together similar objects (introduced by MacroFF), for generating sub-goal specific macros. In other words, CAP divides complex planning problems into independent subproblems by abstracting the components of the original problem.…”
Section: Reformulation Techniques For Classical Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods, including OMA (Chrpa, Vallati, and McCluskey 2015), MacroPlanner (Jonsson 2007), and CAP (Asai and Fukunaga 2015), are semi-online. They analyze the given domain and problem instance before search commences, without using knowledge from similar domains or problems, but also without utlizing information from the search.…”
Section: Macro Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%