2005
DOI: 10.1108/02630800510610116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some lessons learned from post‐earthquake damage survey of structures in Bam, Iran earthquake of 2003

Abstract: Purpose -Some lessons learned from post-earthquake damage survey of structures affected by the Bam earthquake of December 26, 2003 in Iran are encapsulated in this paper. The Bam earthquake caused catastrophic structural damage in the region. Design/methodology/approach -A method similar to that of rapid evaluation procedure (REP), recommended by the Applied Technology Council (ATC-20) in the USA, was used for damage survey. Findings -Bam represents a typical ancient city in many countries around the world. Mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Ministry of Road and Urban Development Planning is obligated to supervise the various stages of design and construction of buildings. 14 In general, based on the results of the studies, the following factors should be considered to prevent such destructions caused by an earthquake in the future: reduction plans with the placement in which the plan will be implemented [15][16][17]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ministry of Road and Urban Development Planning is obligated to supervise the various stages of design and construction of buildings. 14 In general, based on the results of the studies, the following factors should be considered to prevent such destructions caused by an earthquake in the future: reduction plans with the placement in which the plan will be implemented [15][16][17]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy that because negligible damages were observed in the dome roof of the unretrofitted shaking table specimen and its collapse originated from wall separation, no special attention is paid for retrofitting of this structural part. Observations from past earthquakes on performance of adobe buildings with arched roof by Maheri , Mehrabian and Haldar , Manafpour , Ahmadizadeh and Shakib , Mahdi , Zahrai and Heidarzadeh , reference and the numerical analyses by Mirzaei and Eshghi ensure that these roofs behaved more acceptably in adobe buildings compared with other roof systems, and the main weakness of these buildings is the detachment of the perpendicular walls.…”
Section: Retrofit Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Recent researches in Iran especially after the Bam 2003 earthquake (Mehrabian and Achintya 2005) show that adobe and unreinforced masonry constructions are very susceptible to earthquake shakings and could not be used in seismically active zones. The existing constructions of these kinds must be retrofitted by available technologies.…”
Section: Survey and Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%