2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2016.07.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sound radiation and transmission loss characteristics of a honeycomb sandwich panel with composite facings: Effect of inherent material damping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Few studies have revealed the advantage of using honeycomb cores to improve the STL of sandwich structures. Arunkumar et al [60] carried out a numerical study on the STL of sandwich structures with honeycomb core. In their study, honeycomb cores made from epoxy/graphite fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) were compared with those made from aluminum.…”
Section: Sandwich Core Support Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few studies have revealed the advantage of using honeycomb cores to improve the STL of sandwich structures. Arunkumar et al [60] carried out a numerical study on the STL of sandwich structures with honeycomb core. In their study, honeycomb cores made from epoxy/graphite fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) were compared with those made from aluminum.…”
Section: Sandwich Core Support Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the multilayered equivalent FEM model, equivalent material parameters are used as variables. e equivalent parameter formula is linear and reversible [26], and each change in cell size/embedded depth leads to a change in the material parameters; therefore, the relationship between cell size/embedded depth and natural frequency can be understood indirectly. e following subsection discusses the effect of cell size and embedded depth on the natural frequency of an embedded honeycomb plate.…”
Section: Embedded Honeycomb Structure Geometry Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on eqs. and , a three‐dimensional form of thermodynamic stress–strain–temperature constitutive model for SMP has been developed . The segmented formula is expressed as follows ɛ̇ij+5ν13(12ν)δijɛ̇kk=false{left(1+ν)trueσ̇ijE+σijμɛijλ13true(Eμtrue(12νtrue)1λtrue)δijɛkk+αtrueṪδij, as trueɛ¯ctrue(ttrue)<ɛltrue(Ttrue)left(1+ν)trueσ̇ijE+σijμ¯ɛijtrueɛ¯strue(T,Ctrue)δijλ¯13true(Etrueμ¯true(12νtrue)1λ¯true)δijɛkk+αtrueṪδij, as trueɛ¯c<...>…”
Section: Thermo‐mechanical Constitutive Model For Smpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in which it is made of SMP and used to the composite structure in engineering application . Referring to the work by Arunkumar et al ., a diagram of sandwich plate with SMP honeycomb core is shown in Figure . The upper and lower skins and a layer of light SMP honeycomb core in the middle are compounded into a honeycomb sandwich plate in Figure (a).…”
Section: Model Of a Smp Honeycomb Corementioning
confidence: 99%