2003
DOI: 10.1128/aem.69.8.4343-4351.2003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sources of Campylobacter Colonization in Broiler Chickens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

28
478
6
15

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 536 publications
(527 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
28
478
6
15
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study from the data presented in Table 2, it is clear that the incidence of C. jejuni identified by traditional method within three year from 2012-2014 was highest in case of samples collected from chicken farms water (14.8%) followed by chicken intestine (12.8%) then raw chicken meat (9.6%). Newell and Fearnley (2003) pointed that contamination of the water lines usually follows rather than precedes colonization of the flock, it may be hypothesized that poor disinfection of water-line may be responsible for the Campylobacter-detection in the following flocks. As pointed out by Newell and Fearnley (2003), their study showed that cleaning and disinfection of water-line between flocks may help to reduce the risk of chicken Campylobacter colonization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study from the data presented in Table 2, it is clear that the incidence of C. jejuni identified by traditional method within three year from 2012-2014 was highest in case of samples collected from chicken farms water (14.8%) followed by chicken intestine (12.8%) then raw chicken meat (9.6%). Newell and Fearnley (2003) pointed that contamination of the water lines usually follows rather than precedes colonization of the flock, it may be hypothesized that poor disinfection of water-line may be responsible for the Campylobacter-detection in the following flocks. As pointed out by Newell and Fearnley (2003), their study showed that cleaning and disinfection of water-line between flocks may help to reduce the risk of chicken Campylobacter colonization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Newell and Fearnley (2003) pointed that contamination of the water lines usually follows rather than precedes colonization of the flock, it may be hypothesized that poor disinfection of water-line may be responsible for the Campylobacter-detection in the following flocks. As pointed out by Newell and Fearnley (2003), their study showed that cleaning and disinfection of water-line between flocks may help to reduce the risk of chicken Campylobacter colonization. Indeed, unsuitable hygiene practices at the farm level, especially poor cleaning and disinfection of the house and non dedicated protective clothing, could then be a major reason of Campylobacter transmission to human being (Allen and Newell, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is little evidence of vertical transmission of Campylobacter in chickens (Callicott, 2006). Most studies in which Campylobacter has been measured in eggs have postulated that this transmission is due to fecal contamination (Newell and Fearnley, 2003). Cox et al (2012) suggest that transmission from hen to egg is possible, not from vertical, transovarian transmission, rather from contamination of shell membranes and albumen through fecal exposure (Cox et al, 2012).…”
Section: Ubiquity Of Campylobacter In Chickenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…farm animal species. They also indicated a possible role for environmental reservoirs, such as water and flies, in the transmission of Campylobacter strains to poultry and other host sources (Hald et al, 2008;Newell & Fearnley, 2003). Difficulties in the reproducibility of methodology and interpretation of results among laboratories, however, precluded these being used as unified typing schemes by which Campylobacter isolates could be compared on a wider scale (Wassenaar & Newell, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%