2019
DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.13397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial analysis of a hydrocarbon waste‐remediating landfarm demonstrates influence of management practices on bacterial and fungal community structure

Abstract: Summary Cultivation of dedicated soil plots called ‘landfarms' is an effective technology for bioremediation of hydrocarbon waste generated by various industrial practices. To understand the influence of soil conditions on landfarm microbial communities, analysis of bacterial and fungal community structure using next‐generation sequencing at different sections and depths was performed across a hydrocarbon‐waste landfarm in Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada. While a core set of hydrocarbon‐associated bacterial and f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high throughput sequencing of the landfarming soil in the present work indicated the presence of bacterial hydrocarbon-degrading groups, such as Actinomycetales and Burkholderiales [ 27 ]. In accordance with our results, Actinomycetales were also reported as the dominant sub-group in Actinobacteria taxon in landfarming-treated soils [ 28 , 29 ]. The presence of these orders in addition to other taxonomic groups associated with hydrocarbon contamination, such as Gammaproteobacteria, Microbacteriaceae, Mycobacterium , Gordonia , and Pseudomonas [ 14 , 27 , 29 ], indicate the positive potential of the bacterial communities in LF2 for bioremediation strategies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The high throughput sequencing of the landfarming soil in the present work indicated the presence of bacterial hydrocarbon-degrading groups, such as Actinomycetales and Burkholderiales [ 27 ]. In accordance with our results, Actinomycetales were also reported as the dominant sub-group in Actinobacteria taxon in landfarming-treated soils [ 28 , 29 ]. The presence of these orders in addition to other taxonomic groups associated with hydrocarbon contamination, such as Gammaproteobacteria, Microbacteriaceae, Mycobacterium , Gordonia , and Pseudomonas [ 14 , 27 , 29 ], indicate the positive potential of the bacterial communities in LF2 for bioremediation strategies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In accordance with our results, Actinomycetales were also reported as the dominant sub-group in Actinobacteria taxon in landfarming-treated soils [ 28 , 29 ]. The presence of these orders in addition to other taxonomic groups associated with hydrocarbon contamination, such as Gammaproteobacteria, Microbacteriaceae, Mycobacterium , Gordonia , and Pseudomonas [ 14 , 27 , 29 ], indicate the positive potential of the bacterial communities in LF2 for bioremediation strategies. In this context, bacterial strains were isolated from LF2 in order to build a consortium.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…5 D), perhaps reflecting that bacterial belowground recruitment is more dependent on soil nutrition. Our results from these agricultural soils represent important confirmations of studies from controlled environments [ 57 ] and highlight the impact of modern agriculture practices on soil microbial community structure [ 58 ]. There are some recent studies that point to decreased ecosystem functioning in soils with reduced alpha diversity [ 59 ], although the long-term effects of soil fertilisation in plant production and resilience have yet to be fully examined.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Lane [47] discussed the model adjustment process based on the effect which fertilizer dose has on nitrogen content in soil samples. Bergsveison et al in 2019 [48] used GLM model to show how bacterial diversity is significantly higher in surface soil within landfarm sections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%