2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-15847-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and temporal patterns of agrometeorological indicators in maize producing provinces of South Africa

Abstract: Climate change impacts on maize production in South Africa, i.e., interannual yield variabilities, are still not well understood. This study is based on a recently released reanalysis of climate observations (AgERA5), i.e., temperature, precipitation, solar radiation, and wind speed data. The study assesses climate change effects by quantifying the trend of agrometeorological indicators, their correlation with maize yield, and analyzing their spatiotemporal patterns using Empirical Orthogonal Function. Thereby… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was in line with our prior study where the agrometeorological indicators, such as temperature, precipitation, solar radiation, and wind speed, showed no correlation with maize yield in KwaZulu-Natal. In contrast with Mpumalanga, only precipitation and wind speed were correlated with maize yield 90 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…This was in line with our prior study where the agrometeorological indicators, such as temperature, precipitation, solar radiation, and wind speed, showed no correlation with maize yield in KwaZulu-Natal. In contrast with Mpumalanga, only precipitation and wind speed were correlated with maize yield 90 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…We used the Mann-Kendall (MK) method (Mann, 1945;Kendall, 1962;Pohlert, 2020) to test the trends in the respective climate extreme indices for both the baseline climate and future projections. The MK is a non-parametric test (i.e., the data does not have to meet the normality assumption) and widely used method because of its simplicity (Cattani et al, 2018;Esayas et al, 2018;Afuecheta and Omar, 2021;Li et al, 2021;Simanjuntak et al, 2022). The MK test determines the presence of monotonic (i.e., consistent) increasing or decreasing tendency of data in a given time.…”
Section: Trend Estimation and Testmentioning
confidence: 99%