1992
DOI: 10.2307/144026
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Mismatch and Labor Market Segmentation for African-American and Latina Women

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. Clark University is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Economic Geography.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
92
1
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
92
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Interactions of the commute time variable with the sex and the race of the worker were examined to test for the presence of gender disparity in commute patterns and greater spatial mismatch for non-Caucasians compared to Caucasians (see McLafferty and Preston, 1992;Blumen, 1994;Turner and Niemeier, 1997;MacDonald, 1999).…”
Section: The Mnl Model Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interactions of the commute time variable with the sex and the race of the worker were examined to test for the presence of gender disparity in commute patterns and greater spatial mismatch for non-Caucasians compared to Caucasians (see McLafferty and Preston, 1992;Blumen, 1994;Turner and Niemeier, 1997;MacDonald, 1999).…”
Section: The Mnl Model Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on women and the spatial mismatch hypothesis has yielded mixed results with support of the hypothesis varying by (1) metropolitan age, size, and location (2) residential location within cities, (3) race and ethnicity, and (4) data source and methodological approach (Bell, 1974;Blackley, 1990;Ihlanfeldt, 1993;McLafferty & Preston, 1992Reid, 1985;Thompson, 1997;Vrooman & Greenfield, 1980;Wyly, 1996). 4 However, a growing body of scholarship by feminists and other scholars, particularly geographers and urban planners, suggests that a narrowly drawn conceptualization of the spatial mismatch hypothesis is not appropriate as the underlying premise for designing and implementing welfare-to-work policies.…”
Section: Women Welfare Recipients and The Spatial Mismatchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous other studies have documented from large samples of urban populations in Europe, North America, and Australia that women work closer to home than men do. Work by McLafferty andPreston (1991, 1992) and Johnston-Anumonwo (1995) signals that in addition to class and gender, race also affects the size of the geographic area within which people, and especially women, search for and find work.…”
Section: Spatial Access and Employment Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%