2008
DOI: 10.1177/1350506808091502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatialities of the Secular

Abstract: This article analyses the debate about the Islamic headscarf in France and Turkey, with particular reference to the law passed in France in 2004. It aims to bring out the spatial dimension of the secular: first, by underlining how the issue of the veil collapses spatial scales, from the individual (female) body to global geopolitical tensions; second, by looking at the specific place granted to schools as the primary focus of the political rows; and third, by teasing out some of the implicit assumptions about … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Morocco is imaginatively included in that Muslim North African/Middle Eastern region that is often framed as being in tension on moral/cultural grounds with its western counterpart. Such global discourse is reflected in the ways Muslim communities in Western Europe are portrayed, in a mirroring of global discourses of civilisational clash at different scales (Hancock, 2008(Hancock, , 2017Stehle, 2006). Assumption of different attitudes towards sexual diversity and gender equality are fundamental elements of civilisational clash discourses (Abu-Lughod, 2002;Bracke, 2012;Razack, 2004), as Western civilisation, modernity, and the support of LGBTQ rights are conflated in a discourse that imagines and constructs Muslim populations as stuck in a pre-modern homo/bi/transphobic space-time (Rahman, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morocco is imaginatively included in that Muslim North African/Middle Eastern region that is often framed as being in tension on moral/cultural grounds with its western counterpart. Such global discourse is reflected in the ways Muslim communities in Western Europe are portrayed, in a mirroring of global discourses of civilisational clash at different scales (Hancock, 2008(Hancock, , 2017Stehle, 2006). Assumption of different attitudes towards sexual diversity and gender equality are fundamental elements of civilisational clash discourses (Abu-Lughod, 2002;Bracke, 2012;Razack, 2004), as Western civilisation, modernity, and the support of LGBTQ rights are conflated in a discourse that imagines and constructs Muslim populations as stuck in a pre-modern homo/bi/transphobic space-time (Rahman, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This echoes criticisms about the emphasis placed on uniformity by laïcité and the republican framework in which it is embedded (e.g. Hancock 2008). Scholars have also problematized the republican framework as an instance of color-blindness (Jugé and Perez 2006).…”
Section: Culture As Legitimation Strategymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Catholicism, Lutheranism, Calvinism, and Judaism) (Saunders 2009). Scholars argue that such inconsistency, coupled with French society being implicitly shaped by Christian traditions, create significant issues for religious minorities that can feel and be perceived at odds with a secular and Christian majority (Sommier 2017a;Auslander 2000;Hancock 2008). Baubérot (2007) develops this argument further as he draws attention to the relation between the meanings ascribed to laïcité and society's fears and national representations.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, there are more pluralist conceptions of secularism practiced by the United States and India, which recognize a multiplicity of religious diversity in its citizenry (Calhoun 2010). On the other hand, France's conception of laïcité, and the modern republic of Turkey's laiklik, practices a firm form of secularism, that historically inhibits religious expression in public spaces, such as restricting women who wear hijab from public schools (Calhoun 2010;Hancock 2008;Somer 2013). Secularism must be understood as a form of political and cultural commitments that are dynamic, and open to negotiation and friction within a society.…”
Section: What Is Secularism?mentioning
confidence: 99%