2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15705-9_39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatially Regularized SVM for the Detection of Brain Areas Associated with Stroke Outcome

Abstract: Abstract. This paper introduces a new method to detect group differences in brain images based on spatially regularized support vector machines (SVM). First, we propose to spatially regularize the SVM using a graph encoding the voxels' proximity. Two examples of regularization graphs are provided. Significant differences between two populations are detected using statistical tests on the margins of the SVM. We first tested our method on synthetic examples. We then applied it to 72 stroke patients to detect bra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary, to other high-dimensional methods applied before that perform feature selection (Davatzikos et al [17]; Vemuri et al [50]), dimension reduction steps (Magnin et al [35]; Teipel et al [45]) or use the kernel approach (Ashburner [1]; Cuingnet et al [12]; Cuingnet et al [14]; Kloppel et al [31]), we approached the sMRI classification problem as a large-scale regularization problem using voxels as input features. We have shown here that classification problems with a number of features approaching 1 million can be solved with levels of accuracy that are very competitive with other methods in the field (Cuingnet et al [13]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contrary, to other high-dimensional methods applied before that perform feature selection (Davatzikos et al [17]; Vemuri et al [50]), dimension reduction steps (Magnin et al [35]; Teipel et al [45]) or use the kernel approach (Ashburner [1]; Cuingnet et al [12]; Cuingnet et al [14]; Kloppel et al [31]), we approached the sMRI classification problem as a large-scale regularization problem using voxels as input features. We have shown here that classification problems with a number of features approaching 1 million can be solved with levels of accuracy that are very competitive with other methods in the field (Cuingnet et al [13]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others resort to complicated procedures consisting of several steps based on downsampling of the images (Vemuri et al [50]) or image processing methods (Fan et al [19]). Recently, Ashburner, Kloppel, Cuignet and colleagues have shown that voxel-based classification using kernel methods is not only feasible but produces very good results when classifying sMRI brain images (Ashburner [1]; Chu [11]; Cuingnet et al [12]; Cuingnet et al [14]; Kloppel et al [31]). In a recent comparison of several of the most successful methods, a linear SVM method (Kloppel et al [31]) was one of the best performers (Cuingnet et al [13]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that there are several other solutions with a similar degree of accuracy but that are more "map-like". In the future, analyses might be developed to allow us to find these alternative solutions without much loss of classification accuracy (50).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a few classification methodologies that rely on large scale regularization; most are based on SVM (Ashburner, 2007; Kloppel et al, 2008; Cuingnet et al, 2010a) and the kernel approach. For example, Kloppel and colleagues used linear SVM for automatic classification of gray matter (GM) maps combining it with a high dimensional normalization technique called DARTEL (Ashburner, 2007; Kloppel et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%