2015
DOI: 10.5194/hessd-12-8927-2015
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatio-temporal variability of snow water equivalent in the extra-tropical Andes cordillera from a distributed energy balance modeling and remotely sensed snow cover

Abstract: Abstract. Seasonal snow cover is the primary water resource precursor for human use and environmental sustain along the extratropical Andes Cordillera. Despite its importance, relatively little research has been devoted to understanding the properties, distribution and variability of this natural resource. This research provides high-resolution distributed estimates of end-of-winter and spring snow water equivalent over a 152 000 km2 domain that includes the mountainous reaches of central Chile and Argentina. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)/Terra Snow Cover Daily L3 Global 500-m grid (MOD10A1) product (Hall et al, 1995(Hall et al, , 2006Hall and Riggs, 2007) was used from 2000/2001 through 2013/2014 for validation of maximum annual simulated snow cover extent for a rectangle between latitude 31.5 ∘ -40.0 ∘ S and longitude 69.2 ∘ -72.3 ∘ W. The MOD10A2 scenes was filtered so only scenes with <10% cloud cover (in the area of interest) was used, and the chosen scene was inspected to ensure minimum cloud cover interference. Also, snow depth observations covering the period from 2010 to 2014 in four intense-study basins were calculated into 4 × 4 km grid mean snow depth values (grid increments identical to the grids used in SnowModel), and used for verification (Ayala et al, 2014;Cornwell et al, 2016). Both independent validation methods showed significant results between observations and simulations , even though local and regional topographical influences, thermal instability in the troposphere can produce local to regional snow conditions that are much more complex than coarse-scale patterns (e.g.…”
Section: Snowmodel Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)/Terra Snow Cover Daily L3 Global 500-m grid (MOD10A1) product (Hall et al, 1995(Hall et al, , 2006Hall and Riggs, 2007) was used from 2000/2001 through 2013/2014 for validation of maximum annual simulated snow cover extent for a rectangle between latitude 31.5 ∘ -40.0 ∘ S and longitude 69.2 ∘ -72.3 ∘ W. The MOD10A2 scenes was filtered so only scenes with <10% cloud cover (in the area of interest) was used, and the chosen scene was inspected to ensure minimum cloud cover interference. Also, snow depth observations covering the period from 2010 to 2014 in four intense-study basins were calculated into 4 × 4 km grid mean snow depth values (grid increments identical to the grids used in SnowModel), and used for verification (Ayala et al, 2014;Cornwell et al, 2016). Both independent validation methods showed significant results between observations and simulations , even though local and regional topographical influences, thermal instability in the troposphere can produce local to regional snow conditions that are much more complex than coarse-scale patterns (e.g.…”
Section: Snowmodel Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the fact that key hydrological processes at should also be considered when trying to forecast their hydrological response to climate modifications (Souvignet et al, 2010;Vuille et al, 2008). As shown in Cornwell, Molotch, and McPhee (2016), even nearby watersheds exhibit differences in terms of snow water equivalent (associated to the snow accumulation)…”
Section: Climate Variability/climate Change Effect On Water Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SWE is an important parameter for snow hydrology, snow climatology and avalanche formations (Egli et al 2009;Rice et al 2011;L opez-Moreno et al 2016). The SWE can be estimated by snow depth (h s ) and bulk density (q) (Jonas et al 2009), automatic methods and empirical models (Skaugen 2007;Egli et al 2009;Clark et al 2011;Clow et al 2012;Bavera et al 2014;Cornwell et al 2016), ground penetrating radar (P€ alli et al 2002;Godio and Rege 2016;Holbrook et al 2016) and remote sensing techniques (Foster et al 2005). The SWE was measured at several regions for the characterisations of snow cover and also for the validation of several models (Liston and Sturm 2002;Bocchiola and Rosso 2007;Sturm et al 2010;Rice et al 2011;L opez-Moreno et al 2013L opez-Moreno et al , 2016Cornwell et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%