2007 IEEE International Multitopic Conference 2007
DOI: 10.1109/inmic.2007.4557681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speaker Verification Using Boosted Cepstral Features with Gaussian Distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The speaker-specific information can be extracted from feature extraction techniques at a reduced data rate [13]. These feature vectors contain vocal tract, excitation source and behavioral traits of speaker-specific information [4].…”
Section: Speaker Verification Studies Using Different Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The speaker-specific information can be extracted from feature extraction techniques at a reduced data rate [13]. These feature vectors contain vocal tract, excitation source and behavioral traits of speaker-specific information [4].…”
Section: Speaker Verification Studies Using Different Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest approach to train a UBM is to pool all the data and use it via expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm [20]. The coupled target and background speaker model components are integrated effectively while performing speaker recognition, when Maximum a posteriori (MAP) adaptation is used [13].…”
Section: Speaker Modeling and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, linear prediction model is a pure mathematics model without consideration on processing features of human auditory system. Other techniques used are: Linear Predictive Cepstral Coefficients (LPCC); Perceptual Linear Prediction (PLP); Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC); and Neural Predictive Coding (NPC) [1], [2], [3]. MFCC is a popular technique because it is based on the known variation of the human ear's critical frequency bandwidth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide range of approaches may be used to parametrically represent the speech signal to be used in the SR activity (Saeidi et al 2007;Zilca et al 2003). Some of the techniques include: Linear Prediction Coding (LPC); Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC); Linear Predictive Cepstral Coefficients (LPCC); Perceptual Linear Prediction (PLP); and Neural Predictive Coding (NPC) (Salman et al 2007;Paul et al 2009;Charbuillet et al 2007). MFCC is a popular technique because it is based on the known variation of the human ear's critical frequency bandwidth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%