2019
DOI: 10.3390/geosciences9060277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Special Issue on Remote Sensing of Snow and Its Applications

Abstract: Snow cover is an essential climate variable directly affecting the Earth’s energy balance. Snow cover has a number of important physical properties that exert an influence on global and regional energy, water, and carbon cycles. Remote sensing provides a good understanding of snow cover and enable snow cover information to be assimilated into hydrological, land surface, meteorological, and climate models for predicting snowmelt runoff, snow water resources, and to warn about snow-related natural hazards. The m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effort requires that data and models be seamlessly integrated across the international border of the U.S. and Canada (Gronewold et al 2018), as demonstrated in the expansion of the National Water Model across the Great Lakes region (Mason et al 2019). Forecasting efforts could also benefit from the assimilation of state‐of‐the‐art measurements of antecedent conditions (e.g., snowpack, Arslan and Akyürek 2019, soil moisture, Entekhabi et al 2010), as well as additional runoff model intercomparisons (Gaborit et al 2017) and improvements in models of open‐water evapotranspiration (Charusombat et al 2018). Medium‐range water level forecasts would further improve with increased skill in precipitation and temperature forecasts at subseasonal to seasonal lead times (Vitart et al 2017); recent efforts in the Great Lakes region have focused on developing a suite of seasonal forecast tools for this purpose (Bolinger et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effort requires that data and models be seamlessly integrated across the international border of the U.S. and Canada (Gronewold et al 2018), as demonstrated in the expansion of the National Water Model across the Great Lakes region (Mason et al 2019). Forecasting efforts could also benefit from the assimilation of state‐of‐the‐art measurements of antecedent conditions (e.g., snowpack, Arslan and Akyürek 2019, soil moisture, Entekhabi et al 2010), as well as additional runoff model intercomparisons (Gaborit et al 2017) and improvements in models of open‐water evapotranspiration (Charusombat et al 2018). Medium‐range water level forecasts would further improve with increased skill in precipitation and temperature forecasts at subseasonal to seasonal lead times (Vitart et al 2017); recent efforts in the Great Lakes region have focused on developing a suite of seasonal forecast tools for this purpose (Bolinger et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, in situ monitoring has been the principal tool used for observing and, therefore, understanding snow dynamics [16]. However, the intrinsic limitations of accessibility, measurement representativeness, and area coverage have made remote sensing one of the techniques extensively used for snow monitoring [10,11,[17][18][19][20]. Optical sensors have been widely exploited to derive snow cover maps [8,13,18,[20][21][22][23], as well as to compute snow albedo [24][25][26] and grain size [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the intrinsic limitations of accessibility, measurement representativeness, and area coverage have made remote sensing one of the techniques extensively used for snow monitoring [10,11,[17][18][19][20]. Optical sensors have been widely exploited to derive snow cover maps [8,13,18,[20][21][22][23], as well as to compute snow albedo [24][25][26] and grain size [27]. The revisiting time of some days in the case of high resolution imagery, and the presence of clouds are the main limitation for these sensors in the case of snow monitoring [28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%