2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specialized 16SrX phytoplasmas induce diverse morphological and physiological changes in their respective fruit crops

Abstract: The host-pathogen combinations—Malus domestica (apple)/`Candidatus Phytoplasma mali´, Prunus persica (peach)/`Ca. P. prunorum´ and Pyrus communis (pear)/`Ca. P. pyri´ show different courses of diseases although the phytoplasma strains belong to the same 16SrX group. While infected apple trees can survive for decades, peach and pear trees die within weeks to few years. To this date, neither morphological nor physiological differences caused by phytoplasmas have been studied in these host plants. In this study, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can also not discard the possibility that other phytohormones besides SA and JA, such as ethylene and abscisic acid (which were not measured here), might play a role in interactions among cranberries, phytoplasma, and insect herbivores ( Dermastia, 2019 ). It is worth noting that phytoplasma infection not only exclusively affects the plant nutritional and biochemical composition, but also induces morphological and physiological changes in their respective host plants ( Gallinger et al, 2021 ); thus, other factors not measured here could have also contributed to the observed improved herbivore performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We can also not discard the possibility that other phytohormones besides SA and JA, such as ethylene and abscisic acid (which were not measured here), might play a role in interactions among cranberries, phytoplasma, and insect herbivores ( Dermastia, 2019 ). It is worth noting that phytoplasma infection not only exclusively affects the plant nutritional and biochemical composition, but also induces morphological and physiological changes in their respective host plants ( Gallinger et al, 2021 ); thus, other factors not measured here could have also contributed to the observed improved herbivore performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It is puzzling, how infected wild-type plants appear to succeed a better maintenance of supply of the terminal sinks than Atcals7ko plants. A reason may be that callose does not constrict all sieve pores (Gallinger et al 2021 ; Buoso et al 2022 ), but stem stunting (Pagliari et al 2016 ) is indicative of a serious disturbance of phloem function (Maust et al 2003 ). Perhaps, constriction of sieve pores—including those of PPUs—due to phytoplasma infection prevents lateral symplasmic loss from SEs and loss is solely controlled by membrane-located release/retrieval transporters (van Bel 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phytoplasmas are usually confined in the sieve elements from where they release defence and stress-related effectors that may spread through the vascular system and affect the distal plant organs and tissues, altering their physiology and structures [ 7 , 8 , 9 ]. As a consequence, the phytoplasma-induced impairment of the host plants is usually associated with non-specific symptoms, such as chlorosis, premature reddening, leaf curl, abnormal growth, or reduced vigour, and may highly vary according to the concerned host-pathogen combination [ 10 ]. On grapevines, external visible FDp-induced symptoms mainly consist of colour alterations of the leaf surface and veins, with a yellowing (white-fruited cvs) or reddening (red-fruited cvs) of the lamina.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%