2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41564-021-01014-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species- and site-specific genome editing in complex bacterial communities

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
140
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
140
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to environmental selection and dispersal, diversification ( i.e. , the generation of novel genetic variation) can contribute to diversity patterns in microbial communities 30, 32, 33 . To explore the role of spatial structuring on viral genotypic heterogeneity across the field site, we profiled within-population genomic variation.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to environmental selection and dispersal, diversification ( i.e. , the generation of novel genetic variation) can contribute to diversity patterns in microbial communities 30, 32, 33 . To explore the role of spatial structuring on viral genotypic heterogeneity across the field site, we profiled within-population genomic variation.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although archaeal methanotrophs of the genus Methanoperedens have been studied using cultivation-independent [37] and enrichment-based methods [3], many questions regarding their physiology remain. We hope that this discovery of naturally occurring plasmids associated with Methanoperedens in stable enrichment cultures, paired with the possibility of editing the genomes of specific organisms in microbial communities [38], is a first step towards developing genetic modification approaches to better understand anaerobic oxidation of methane and potentially to harness this process for agricultural and climate engineering.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA fragments were size selected using AMPure XP magnetic beads (Beckman Coulter, United States) at the recommended ratios 0.4X and 0.2X. We used a modified version of the protocol described in Wetmore et al (2015) , with a two-step PCR used to enrich for transposon insertion sites, based on ( Rubin et al, 2021 ). A custom splinkerette adapter was ligated to fragmented DNA, prepared by annealing oligos:/5Phos/G*ATCGGAAGAGCACACGTCTGGGTTTTTT TTTTCAAAAAAA*A and G*AGATCGGTCTCGGCATTCCC AGACGTGTGCTCTTCCGATC*T ( Rubin et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a modified version of the protocol described in Wetmore et al (2015) , with a two-step PCR used to enrich for transposon insertion sites, based on ( Rubin et al, 2021 ). A custom splinkerette adapter was ligated to fragmented DNA, prepared by annealing oligos:/5Phos/G*ATCGGAAGAGCACACGTCTGGGTTTTTT TTTTCAAAAAAA*A and G*AGATCGGTCTCGGCATTCCC AGACGTGTGCTCTTCCGATC*T ( Rubin et al, 2021 ). Between rounds of PCR and before submitting for sequencing, DNA was cleaned by binding to AMPure XP magnetic beads, using a bead ratio of 0.9X and eluted in 15 μl 0.1X TE buffer for intermediate steps and 30 μl 0.1X TE for sequencing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%