“…Our rationale for studying taxon rather than species diversity are: (1) the taxonomic limitations of different meiofaunal groups, especially in tropical ecosystems (e.g., about 70% of meiofaunal harpacticoid copepods in these regions are new to science, De Troch, 2001); (2) food preferences and strategies within a specific meiofauna group are far from known. Species-specific food preferences are only documented for a few nematode (e.g., Moens, Verbeeck, de Maeyer, Swings, & Vincx, 1999;Ó lafsson, Modig, & van de Bund, 1999) and copepod species (e.g., Buffan-Dubau & Carman, 2000;De Troch, Steinarsdó ttir, Chepurnov, & Ó lafsson, 2005;Pace & Carman, 1996) and may imply that certain levels of productivity will be used in different ways, i.e., less or more intensive so certain segments of the productivity range will be characterised by lower or higher species diversity. The use of higher taxa may skew the resolution of the diversity trends, however, it is hard to say whether this would consequently result in a hump-shaped relationship between productivity and diversity.…”