2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.02979.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specific allergy to Penaeus monodon (seawater shrimp) or Macrobrachium rosenbergii (freshwater shrimp) in shrimp‐allergic children

Abstract: Specific allergy to Pm or Mr was confirmed by food challenges. SPT using crude extracts and the PTP test are useful tools for screening shrimp sensitization before a food challenge. The predictive probability of SPT is helpful where a food challenge is not feasible.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
83
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
83
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these were a minority, and this is one main finding of the present multicenter study. This is in keeping with the observation that some of the shrimp allergens mentioned above, namely sarcoplasmic calcium-binding protein and myosin light chain, seem to play a more relevant role in the pediatric population [14,15], whereas all our patients were adults. However, in other adult populations the prevalence of sensitization to myosin light chain, arginine kinase or sarcoplasmic calcium-binding proteins largely exceeded that found in our patients [18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, these were a minority, and this is one main finding of the present multicenter study. This is in keeping with the observation that some of the shrimp allergens mentioned above, namely sarcoplasmic calcium-binding protein and myosin light chain, seem to play a more relevant role in the pediatric population [14,15], whereas all our patients were adults. However, in other adult populations the prevalence of sensitization to myosin light chain, arginine kinase or sarcoplasmic calcium-binding proteins largely exceeded that found in our patients [18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…As a consequence, in view of possible allergenic differences with freshwater shrimps [15], fresh shrimps belonging to these seawater species were employed to carry out both in vivo and in vitro tests.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(14) Clinical management is problematic due to the unpredictability of its reaction, which varies with the species of shellfish, the quantity eaten, the body part affected, and possibly, the preparation method. (15)(16)(17) In addition, its abundant use in Asian cooking, together with poor food labelling practices in Singapore, (18) makes accidental ingestion of shellfish difficult to avoid.…”
Section: Specific Food Allergies In Singaporementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then 50 毺g of prawn extract was applied to immobilized non-linear pH [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] gradient strip of 7 cm length for rehydration overnight (12)(13)(14) h). Isoelectric focusing was run at 20 曟 using the Protean IEF Cell Apparatus (BioRad, USA) with the following voltage/time gradient: 100 V for 1 min, 250 V for 30 min, 4 000 V for 2 h and 4 000 V for 10 000 V-h. Before transferring the IPG strip onto the second dimension, the strip was equilibrated sequentially for 10 min in a buffer containing 65 mM dithio-threitol and then 135 mM iodoacetamide in 125 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 6 M urea, 2% SDS, 30% glycerol and 0.01% bromophenol blue.…”
Section: Two-dimensional (2-de) Gel Electrophoresismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among shellfish allergies, prawn is the most frequent culprit [2,3] . Sensitized individuals can develop urticaria, angioedema, laryngospasm, asthma and life-threatening anaphylaxis [4,5] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%