2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specificity of representations in infants’ visual statistical learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, limited talker variability may only be helpful in challenging situations when it perfectly corresponds to changes in structure. Under these circumstances, previous studies have found it can be used as a learning support, perhaps drawing attention to the talkerspecific change (e.g., Antovich, Gluck, Goldman, & Graf Estes, 2020;Graf Estes & Lew-Williams, 2015;Weiss et al, 2009;Zinszer & Weiss, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, limited talker variability may only be helpful in challenging situations when it perfectly corresponds to changes in structure. Under these circumstances, previous studies have found it can be used as a learning support, perhaps drawing attention to the talkerspecific change (e.g., Antovich, Gluck, Goldman, & Graf Estes, 2020;Graf Estes & Lew-Williams, 2015;Weiss et al, 2009;Zinszer & Weiss, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under these circumstances, previous studies have found it can be used as a learning support, perhaps drawing attention to the talker-specific change (e.g. Antovich et al, 2020;Graf Estes & Lew-Williams 2015;Weiss et al, 2009;Zinszer & Weiss, 2012).…”
Section: Talker Variability As a Desirable Difficultymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have replicated these findings since then, using different types of visual stimuli (Emberson et al, 2019), in younger (Bulf et al, 2011) and older infants (Antovich et al, 2020). Critically, these findings have also been replicated using test designs that allowed concluding more straightforwardly that infants were sensitive to the statistical relations between elements (i.e., TPs and/or co‐occurrence frequency), rather than merely to local redundancies or frequency of individual elements (Marcovitch & Lewkowicz, 2009; Slone & Johnson, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%