1993
DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.64.2.169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral Examination of the 16 June 1992 Earthquake and Quarry Blast Near Evansville, Indiana

Abstract: On 16 June 1992, an mLg 2.3 earthquake occurred in southwestern Indiana, near Evansville. This area is part of the Illinois Basin coal belt, an area of active surface mines with numerous strip-mine blasts daily. The co-location of earthquakes and strip-mine blasts enable spectral comparisons without significant concern for differences due to path propagation effects. Discriminating between the two types of events can be done visually due to the distinctive appearance of the Rg phase in strip-min… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, a critical issue in data processing is to discriminate earthquakes from blasts. The waveform of a blast typically has a low-frequency P wave and a highfrequency coda of surface waves with relatively large amplitudes, known as the R g phase (Hutchenson and Herrmann, 1993). In addition, the origin times of blasts or explosions are chiefly concentrated during local daylight hours.…”
Section: Earthquake Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, a critical issue in data processing is to discriminate earthquakes from blasts. The waveform of a blast typically has a low-frequency P wave and a highfrequency coda of surface waves with relatively large amplitudes, known as the R g phase (Hutchenson and Herrmann, 1993). In addition, the origin times of blasts or explosions are chiefly concentrated during local daylight hours.…”
Section: Earthquake Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is effectively a form of additional bias that could cause an underestimation of the seismicity rate if not handled carefully. During the 20-day test period, less than 1% of the local events were classified as natural earthquakes based on the discrimination rules in Hutchenson and Herrmann (1993).…”
Section: Earthquake Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%