1989
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-83479-0_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectroscopic Manifestations of Vibronic Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 159 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The structure of EF 3 molecules is well-known to be a bent T-shaped C 2 v structure (Figure ) when the central atom is Cl, Br, or I. This can be explained by the VSEPR theory or the second-order Jahn−Teller (SOJT) effects. Relativistic effects on the SOJT distortions of group 17 element fluorides have been studied. , Schwerdtfeger investigated scalar relativistic effects on the bonding distances and F−E−F distortion angles for heavier Br, I, and At. He presented a detailed study on the SOJT distortion from ClF 3 to AtF 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure of EF 3 molecules is well-known to be a bent T-shaped C 2 v structure (Figure ) when the central atom is Cl, Br, or I. This can be explained by the VSEPR theory or the second-order Jahn−Teller (SOJT) effects. Relativistic effects on the SOJT distortions of group 17 element fluorides have been studied. , Schwerdtfeger investigated scalar relativistic effects on the bonding distances and F−E−F distortion angles for heavier Br, I, and At. He presented a detailed study on the SOJT distortion from ClF 3 to AtF 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the E @ e nsystem has received much attention in the last 25 years (see, for example, the book by Bersuker and Polinger 1989), very few, if any, calculations have been directed towards deriving the second-order RFS. Part of the problem arises from the general difliculty of actually carrying out the calculations and the other difficulty is that most approaches use only numerical methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%