2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.99.064406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin transport across the interface in ferromagnetic/nonmagnetic systems

Abstract: Understanding interfacial spin transport is key to developing magnetoelectonic devices, however, the exact nature of the parameters involved is unclear. Here, we report a detailed ferromagnetic resonance-based spintransport analysis on a variety of structures of both ferromagnetic (Co, CoFeB) and heavy metal layers (Pt, Ru) in order to fully quantify the interfacial spin-transport parameters. Enhanced spin-mixing conductance is observed for more closely matched ferromagnet and heavy metal crystal structures, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These values are in the typical order of magnitude of effective spin mixing conductances obtained for ferromagnetic/Pt systems (for Py/Pt: 21-30 nm −2 [23,29,31,33]; for Co/Pt: 80 nm −2 [26]) and epitaxial Fe/Pt: 26 nm −2 [43]. Especially, for the CoFeB/Pt interface, some reported values are 40 nm −2 [44], 54 nm −2 , and 47 nm −2 for the opposite stacking order, Pt/CoFeB, in [45] and 50.7 nm −2 in [46]). In the case of Ir has been reported for NiFe/Ir interfaces so far 13 nm −2 in [17] and 25.2 nm −2 in [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values are in the typical order of magnitude of effective spin mixing conductances obtained for ferromagnetic/Pt systems (for Py/Pt: 21-30 nm −2 [23,29,31,33]; for Co/Pt: 80 nm −2 [26]) and epitaxial Fe/Pt: 26 nm −2 [43]. Especially, for the CoFeB/Pt interface, some reported values are 40 nm −2 [44], 54 nm −2 , and 47 nm −2 for the opposite stacking order, Pt/CoFeB, in [45] and 50.7 nm −2 in [46]). In the case of Ir has been reported for NiFe/Ir interfaces so far 13 nm −2 in [17] and 25.2 nm −2 in [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The propagation of spin current, both from a magnetic layer into a NM layer, that enhances magnetic damping and, via the spin Hall effect, from a heavy metal into a magnetic layer, that enables spin-orbit torques (SOT), is well established in ferromagnetic systems and has been demonstrated in ferrimagnetic (FiM) systems [4,5]. Such spin transport has also been shown to depend critically upon the details of the interface [6][7][8][9][10][11]. However, debate continues about the role of PIM in such spin transport physics, both with respect to metallic FM/NM systems [12,13] and in insulating ferrimagnets layered with heavy metals (FiM/NM) [14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precessing magnetization in a ferromagnetic layer can transfer spin angular momentum, in the form of a spin current, into an adjacent NM layer 4 , a process referred to as spin pumping. One of the main manifestations of this spin pumping mechanism is an increase in the precessional damping of a system [5][6][7] and, whilst details remain to be understood, the basis of this process is well described for ferromagnetic/metallic systems 5,8 . However, the propagation of spin current through an insulating barrier has led to conflicting results in the literature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%