Split-Step Timing of Professional and Junior Tennis Players

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine the timing of a split-step in three categories of tennis players in four groups of strokes. Subjects were divided into three groups: male and female junior, and male professional tennis players. During two tournaments, all matches were recorded with two fixed video cameras. For every stroke, the timing of the split-step between the opponent’s impact point when hitting the ball and the player’s split-step was measured. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the differences between groups of strokes, players and the interaction Player x Stroke Group. A Tukey post-hoc test was employed to determine specific differences. The results revealed differences between players in detecting the opponent’s movement, stroke and ball flight, which were reflected in different split-step timings. Each tennis player has his/her own timing mechanism which they adapt to various game situations. Response times differ significantly depending on the game situation. On average, they are the lowest in the serve, and then gradually rise from the return of the serve to baseline game, reaching the highest values in specific game situations. Players react faster in the first serve than in the second one and in the return of the serve, the response times are lower after the return of the second serve

Analysis of Characteristics of Tennis Singles Matches Based on 5G and Data Mining Technology

“…e basic purpose of association analysis is to mine hidden association nets or strong association rules between data. e methods of association analysis are abundant, and the common algorithms are smart algorithms and growth algorithms [32]. Tennis singles energy consumption model structure is shown in Figure 2.…”

Returning Serve in Tennis: A Qualitative Examination of the Interaction of Anticipatory Information Sources Used by Professional Tennis Players

“…The returner’s own reactions, movement and returning strategy and execution are considered all critical factors in this regard. Empirical work has demonstrated, that the reactions of returners are faster during the first serve compared to the second serve ( Filipcic et al, 2017 ), which is clearly in part due to the temporal stress of the first serve relative to the second serve. In particular, it has been demonstrated that split step reaction time and movement speed are critical to accurately responding to a fast first serve.…”

Set-to-set Performance Variation in Tennis Grand Slams: Play with Consistency and Risks

“…The complexity and dynamics of tennis determine that player’s game strategy and technical-tactical performance are critically influenced by a range of contextual constraints ( Filipcic et al, 2017 ; Ojala and Häkkinen, 2013 ; Pereira et al, 2018 ). The available research already evidenced that those constraints might originated from the differences of the match location ( O'Donoghue and Ingram, 2001 ), players’ qualities ( Cui et al, 2017 , 2019 ), weather conditions ( Morante and Brotherhood, 2007 ), score-line ( O'Donoghue, 2012 ), spatial-temporal relationships among players ( Carvalho et al, 2013 ; Martinez-Gallego et al, 2013 ), physiological fatigue ( Gomes et al, 2011 ; Reid and Duffield, 2014 ), noise of the audience ( Dube and Tatz, 1991 ) and even the line-calling bias ( Carboch et al, 2016 ).…”