2019
DOI: 10.1007/s13187-019-01583-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spreading Ideas: TED Talks’ Role in Cancer Communication and Public Engagement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence, we can only speculate as to the causal mechanisms underlying our results and must refer to future experimental work to settle the issue. Second, TED Talks are but one form of public science communication (MacKrill et al 2021;Sugimoto and Thelwall, 2013;Verjovsky and Jurberg, 2020). It is unclear to what extent our findings translate to, for instance, academic posts on social media (Rohrer et al 2021) or traditional press releases, especially considering that text-based forms of science communication were found to rely less on affective language than TED Talks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…As a consequence, we can only speculate as to the causal mechanisms underlying our results and must refer to future experimental work to settle the issue. Second, TED Talks are but one form of public science communication (MacKrill et al 2021;Sugimoto and Thelwall, 2013;Verjovsky and Jurberg, 2020). It is unclear to what extent our findings translate to, for instance, academic posts on social media (Rohrer et al 2021) or traditional press releases, especially considering that text-based forms of science communication were found to rely less on affective language than TED Talks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…As a consequence, we can only speculate as to the causal mechanisms underlying our results and must refer to future experimental work to settle the above-mentioned hypotheses. Second, TED talks are a particular form of public science communication (MacKrill et al, 2021;Sugimoto & Thelwall, 2013;Verjovsky & Jurberg, 2020) that likely differs from other kinds, especially those based purely on text, which were found to rely much less on affective language. It is therefore unclear to what extent our findings translate to, for instance, academic posts on social media (Rohrer et al, 2021) or traditional press releases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TED talks are video recordings of short presentations on technology, entertainment, and design, including many talks on basic and applied science. Given these characteristics, TED talks are considered a modern form of science communication (e.g., MacKrill et al, 2021;Sugimoto & Thelwall, 2013;Verjovsky & Jurberg, 2020). On their webpage (www.ted.com), the TED organization provides curated transcript for all talk, which can be used to derive their affective features.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "multiple fields" and "multiple diversity" refers to the fact that TED presents a rich and broad diversity in the perspective of each viewers through all kinds of lectures, including education, biology, physics, philosophy, psychology, design and invention, and many other fields. In the study by Verjovsky and Jurberg (2019), the public had a more positive response and support for scientific TED lectures. To a certain extent, it has facilitated the sharing and exchange of global knowledge, making it possible for knowledge without borders to become a reality.…”
Section: The Advantages and Characteristics Of Tedmentioning
confidence: 96%