2003
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.3.289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spreading of Epithelial Cells on Machined and Sandblasted Titanium Surfaces: An In Vitro Study

Abstract: These results indicate that sandblasted surfaces are the optimal substrata for epithelial cell adhesion and spreading.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
16
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The filopodia were extended and evenly distributed over the surface. This phenomenon of altered epithelial morphology is indicating that XB-2 cells have a better growth rate on the rough surface [19]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The filopodia were extended and evenly distributed over the surface. This phenomenon of altered epithelial morphology is indicating that XB-2 cells have a better growth rate on the rough surface [19]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early stage cell abilities such as adhesion and proliferation to the substrates can vary according to surface topography, which in turn influences cytoskeletal components [19, 23]. Sandblasting was thought to induce stress on the surface, whereas acid etching was thought to release the resulting residual stresses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the phase of osteoclastic resorption is over and osteoclasts disappear from the resorption site, osteoblasts and their precursors repopulate the resorption site and reline the bone surface 8. Implant surface roughness has been demonstrated to affect the characteristics and the behavior of the osteoblasts at the bone–implant interface, and a higher bone–implant contact percentage has been reported for implants with a rougher surface 9–15. Although osteoblasts play a pivotal role in implant integration in the bone context, osteoclast activity is also required for peri‐implant bone remodeling 16.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Porous implants can provide a safer barrier against infection if invaded by the host tissues at early stages after implantation [7]. The better epithelial cell adhesion and spreading decreases a risk of detachment (avulsion) of the surrounding tissues from the implant [8, 9]. These facts make porous structures promising for implantation to the residuum bone with the purpose of direct skeletal attachment (DSA) of limb prostheses [10, 11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%