2005
DOI: 10.1121/1.4788460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stabilization techniques for ultrasound imaging of speech articulations

Abstract: One challenge for the ultrasound imaging of the tongue during connected speech is stabilization of both speakers heads and the ultrasound transducer. To accurately analyze tongue shapes, researchers must ensure that differences among images result from changes in tongue shape, not head or transducer movement. In this validation study, we present an inexpensive, space-saving technique for stabilizing the head and transducer during the collection of ultrasound images in the laboratory. Four speakers were video-r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each participant's 3 Some research indicates that a labial following consonant may be more likely to block coarticulation with the following vowel than /h/ (Scobbie and Pouplier 2010); thus, a significant difference between the stem condition and either pre-or post-boundary stimuli suggests that an effect is present and strong. head was fit into a moldable head stabilizer (Comfort Company) that is mounted on the wall, and the head was further stabilized with a Velcro strap around the forehead (Davidson and De Decker 2005;Davidson 2006). This method, when used together with an ultrasound transducer that is fixed in place with a BogenManfrotto Magic Arm, ensures that the same slice of tongue is imaged (Davidson 2012).…”
Section: Design and Data Collection 231 Ultrasoundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each participant's 3 Some research indicates that a labial following consonant may be more likely to block coarticulation with the following vowel than /h/ (Scobbie and Pouplier 2010); thus, a significant difference between the stem condition and either pre-or post-boundary stimuli suggests that an effect is present and strong. head was fit into a moldable head stabilizer (Comfort Company) that is mounted on the wall, and the head was further stabilized with a Velcro strap around the forehead (Davidson and De Decker 2005;Davidson 2006). This method, when used together with an ultrasound transducer that is fixed in place with a BogenManfrotto Magic Arm, ensures that the same slice of tongue is imaged (Davidson 2012).…”
Section: Design and Data Collection 231 Ultrasoundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two types of approaches have been used in the literature to address this problem. The first approach involves stabilizing the head relative to the ultrasound probe, either by immobilizing the participant's head (e.g., Davidson and De Decker, 2005), or by attaching the probe to a helmet that the participant wears (e.g., Scobbie et al, 2008). Immobilization reduces natural head movements that accompany speech.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasound Tongue Imaging (UTI) is a non-invasive technique that allows researchers to observe the position, shape and movements of the tongue in real time during speech [1]. Although the UTI technique has made great strides forward in recent decades, stabilizing the ultrasound transducer under the speakers chin has remained a major challenge [2]. Many participants in experiments leave the data collection session due to the discomfort and pain they experience after a few minutes of recording.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%