Electrical Overstress/Electrostatic Discharge Symposium Proceedings. 1999 (IEEE Cat. No.99TH8396)
DOI: 10.1109/eosesd.1999.818992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stacked PMOS clamps for high voltage power supply protection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total gate current of Mc1 is equal to the total gate current through the oxide of Mn, which can be derived as (4) The voltage differences between the source and drain of both Mc1 and Mn are 0 V, so that the gate-to-drain current and the gate-to-source current should be the same. Therefore, (4) can be simplified to the component of only gate-to-source current for Mc1 and Mn, which can be derived as (5) The total gate-to-source current of Mc1 in the (5) can be solved by the given voltage of 0.3 V with the device parameters provided from foundry, which can be roughly calculated as (6) With consideration of the RC time constant, the W/L of MOS capacitor Mc1 is chosen as 5 m/5 m, and the total gate-tosource current of Mc1 can be determined by (6). Therefore, the device dimension of Mn can also be determined by (5).…”
Section: New Proposed Ultra-low-leakage Power-rail Esd Clamp Cirmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The total gate current of Mc1 is equal to the total gate current through the oxide of Mn, which can be derived as (4) The voltage differences between the source and drain of both Mc1 and Mn are 0 V, so that the gate-to-drain current and the gate-to-source current should be the same. Therefore, (4) can be simplified to the component of only gate-to-source current for Mc1 and Mn, which can be derived as (5) The total gate-to-source current of Mc1 in the (5) can be solved by the given voltage of 0.3 V with the device parameters provided from foundry, which can be roughly calculated as (6) With consideration of the RC time constant, the W/L of MOS capacitor Mc1 is chosen as 5 m/5 m, and the total gate-tosource current of Mc1 can be determined by (6). Therefore, the device dimension of Mn can also be determined by (5).…”
Section: New Proposed Ultra-low-leakage Power-rail Esd Clamp Cirmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a leaky ESD protection circuit is barely tolerable in portable products with low power requirements. High-voltage-tolerant power-rail ESD clamp circuits with only thin-oxide devices have been reported to overcome the gate-oxide reliability issue [6]- [8]. However, the prior designs did not consider the effect of gate leakage current if such circuits are further implemented in nanometer CMOS processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the mixed-voltage circuit application, the stacked nMOS structure had been widely used in the mixed-voltage input/output (I/O) buffer [15] to solve the gate-oxide reliability issue without using the additional thick-gate-oxide process (also known as dual gate oxide in some CMOS processes) [16], or the power-rail ESD clamp circuit [17]. Unfortunately, in such mixed-voltage I/O circuits, the stacked nMOS often have a much lower ESD level, as compared to the buffer with single nMOS [18], [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve the gate-oxide reliability issue without using the additional thick gate oxide process (also known as dual gate oxides in some CMOS processes [5], [6]), the stacked-MOS configuration has been widely used in the mixed-voltage I/O buffers [7]- [12], and in the power-rail ESD clamp circuits [13]. The typical 3-V/5-V-tolerant mixed-voltage I/O circuit is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%