2007
DOI: 10.1071/wf06087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stand-specific litter moisture content calibrations for the Canadian Fine Fuel Moisture Code

Abstract: A large dataset of litter moisture measurements collected at several sites across Canada by the Canadian Forest Service over the period from 1939 to 1961 is analysed. The stands in which sampling was carried out were described by three main variables: forest type (pine, spruce, Douglas fir, mixedwood and deciduous), season (spring, summer and fall), and stand density (light, moderate and dense). All three variables were found to have a significant influence on the relationship between the Canadian Forest Fire … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, more active use of forest for recreation purposes might increase the number of fire ignition cases. The observed increase in mean fire size in higher fire danger classes indicates a more favourable combination of flammable fuels and weather conditions for fire spread during more severe fire-weather periods (Wotton and Beverly 2007). Similar trends of increasing mean fire size with increasing fire-weather risk has been observed in Finland (Lehtonen et al 2016); nevertheless, the damage is greater after fires that occurred during high fire-risk periods (Hasson et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, more active use of forest for recreation purposes might increase the number of fire ignition cases. The observed increase in mean fire size in higher fire danger classes indicates a more favourable combination of flammable fuels and weather conditions for fire spread during more severe fire-weather periods (Wotton and Beverly 2007). Similar trends of increasing mean fire size with increasing fire-weather risk has been observed in Finland (Lehtonen et al 2016); nevertheless, the damage is greater after fires that occurred during high fire-risk periods (Hasson et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Climate influences vegetation patterns and determines the length of the fire season (Carvalho et al 2011); however, in the short term, weather drives fire ignition, behaviour, and spread (Wotton and Beverly 2007). Fires affect climate through the change of vegetation structure, surface albedo, and release of aerosols, thus creating a feedback loop (Bowman et al 2009;Bowman et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FBP System (Forestry Canada Fire Danger Group 1992) relies on outputs from the FWI System and other information (such as topography and time of year) and provides quantitative assessments of fire behaviour in a number of major fuel types across Canada. The Accessory Fuel Moisture System (AFMS) contains additional fuel moisture models to provide more temporal resolution to some fast response time fuels (e.g., Van Wagner 1977;Lawson et al 1996) and a means of converting moisture code values to stand-specific moisture (e.g., Lawson et al 1996b;Wotton and Beverly 2007). The Fire Occurrence Prediction (FOP) System does not represent a single developed system used in Canada; expected fire occurrence is typically estimated by local fire managers each day based on an evaluation of fuel moisture, lightning or potential human activity, and the fire manager's professional experience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three forest types differ in litter structure and, possibly, in the moisture of the underlying duff. These factors affect the moisture content of fine dead fuels [46] but are not considered by the MOISTURE model. Under comparable conditions of weather and shading, surface fuels in deciduous hardwoods (BA in our case) are expected to be wetter than in conifers, but the difference decreases with dryness to the point of being insignificant [46].…”
Section: Differences In Weather and Fuel Moisture Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors affect the moisture content of fine dead fuels [46] but are not considered by the MOISTURE model. Under comparable conditions of weather and shading, surface fuels in deciduous hardwoods (BA in our case) are expected to be wetter than in conifers, but the difference decreases with dryness to the point of being insignificant [46]. PP represented the highest mean fire danger, as it combined the highest wind speed with the lowest dead fuel moisture content as a result of a comparatively more open environment.…”
Section: Differences In Weather and Fuel Moisture Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%