2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.12.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardization of terminology in dermoscopy/dermatoscopy: Results of the third consensus conference of the International Society of Dermoscopy

Abstract: Background Evolving dermoscopic terminology motivated us to initiate a new consensus. Objective We sought to establish a dictionary of standardized terms. Methods We reviewed the medical literature, conducted a survey, and convened a discussion among experts. Results Two competitive terminologies exist, a more metaphoric terminology that includes numerous terms and a descriptive terminology based on 5 basic terms. In a survey among members of the International Society of Dermoscopy (IDS) 23.5% (n = 201) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
223
2
22

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 246 publications
(255 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
8
223
2
22
Order By: Relevance
“…The list initially used before preselection was taken from the analytical publications on changes observed in melanomas during dermoscopic followup. This list was first converted to a list of descriptive terminology using the results of the recent third consensus conference on standardization of terminology in dermoscopy, 23 (Fig. We also excluded from this list the criteria that we considered redundant as: (i) overall organization, as it is a consequence of the appearance of the below listed criteria, (ii) the disappearance or less prominence of structures or colors, since those changes were always associated with the concomitant appearance or increased detection (more prominent) in the same area of one of the listed criteria (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The list initially used before preselection was taken from the analytical publications on changes observed in melanomas during dermoscopic followup. This list was first converted to a list of descriptive terminology using the results of the recent third consensus conference on standardization of terminology in dermoscopy, 23 (Fig. We also excluded from this list the criteria that we considered redundant as: (i) overall organization, as it is a consequence of the appearance of the below listed criteria, (ii) the disappearance or less prominence of structures or colors, since those changes were always associated with the concomitant appearance or increased detection (more prominent) in the same area of one of the listed criteria (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This list was compiled using the most recent definitions of dermoscopic criteria published by the International Dermoscopy Society in 2016. 26 …”
Section: Dermoscopic Features In Melanomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,34 In addition, several studies look at specific comparisons of the dermoscopic features of AK, for example, to those of SCC, but not all possible diagnoses. 21,35 When a definition was absent from the International Society of Dermoscopy 2016 consensus meeting 26 , we cited definitions provided from other sources. Finally, while purported to be significant, some feature have yet to be rigorously studied to determine their diagnostic significance.…”
Section: Dermoscopic Features In Actinic Keratoses Squamous Cell Carmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A hemangioma or angiokeratoma usually has red‐purple or red‐blue to black lacunae, and maroon (which is low red in another definition) also known as lagoon‐like structures, as very specific features (Fig. ) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%