2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02446.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardizing for microsatellite length in comparisons of genetic diversity

Abstract: Mutation rates at microsatellites tend to increase with the number of repeats of the motif, leading to higher levels of polymorphism at long microsatellites. To standardize levels of diversity when microsatellites differ in size, we investigate the relationship between tract length and variation and provide a formula to adjust allelic richness to a fixed mean number of repeats in the specific case of chloroplast microsatellites. A comparison between 39 loci from eight species of conifers (where chloroplast DNA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
44
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
7
44
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Diversity is significantly greater for anonymous than for EST-associated microsatellites, as has been reported in previous studies of Helianthus (Pashley et al 2006) and other organisms (Cho et al 2000;Cherdsak et al 2004;Woodhead et al 2005). Levels of genetic diversity are significantly affected by the number of microsatellite repeats (anonymous loci, mean number of repeats ¼ 11.91; ESTassociated loci, mean ¼ 5.83; P , 0.001, one-tailed t-test), which are known to correlate strongly with mutation rate (Petit et al 2005), but not by the length of repeat motifs. However, EST-associated microsatellites are seemingly more likely to have experienced significant selection in the recent past (see below), which might also have contributed to the reduced diversity.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Diversity is significantly greater for anonymous than for EST-associated microsatellites, as has been reported in previous studies of Helianthus (Pashley et al 2006) and other organisms (Cho et al 2000;Cherdsak et al 2004;Woodhead et al 2005). Levels of genetic diversity are significantly affected by the number of microsatellite repeats (anonymous loci, mean number of repeats ¼ 11.91; ESTassociated loci, mean ¼ 5.83; P , 0.001, one-tailed t-test), which are known to correlate strongly with mutation rate (Petit et al 2005), but not by the length of repeat motifs. However, EST-associated microsatellites are seemingly more likely to have experienced significant selection in the recent past (see below), which might also have contributed to the reduced diversity.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Another important point regarding the use of microsatellites for genetic analysis of populations has been raised by Petit et al (2005) who suggested that microsatellite loci with more repeats generally show higher mutation rates (probably because DNA slippage increases in proportion to the number of repeats). In addition, if genetic diversity depends on mutation rate and mutation rate itself depends on the number of repeats subsequently there should be a relationship between microsatellite genetic diversity and the mean number of repeats (MNR).…”
Section: Genetic Structure Of Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, if genetic diversity depends on mutation rate and mutation rate itself depends on the number of repeats subsequently there should be a relationship between microsatellite genetic diversity and the mean number of repeats (MNR). Petit et al (2005) proposed using allele size and the polymorphism rate of chloroplast microsatellite loci to standardize the level of diversity when microsatellites differ in size and investigated the relationship between the MNR and genetic variation as a prerequisite to comparative studies of genetic diversity. Their findings suggested that the greater allelic richness 300 Microsatellites, a review found in some species remains significant after controlling for the number of repeats.…”
Section: Genetic Structure Of Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bias was estimated separately with reference to: a) the sampled array population (480 seeds); and b) to the standardized value of the adult population at n = 400 and n = 480. For this last standardized value we used the results from the first simulations, as resampling without replacement for different sizes produce the same results as rarefaction techniques (Petit et al, 2005), but with the advantage of providing standard errors for the estimations (Fernández-Manjarrés, unpublished results). To further investigate the effect of tree vs. family sampling efforts, we genotyped a subset of 10 of the original 24 families with the most variable molecular marker M2-30 for 40 seeds per tree (n = 40).…”
Section: Family Arrays Diversity Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%