Static and dynamic assessment of STEM gender stereotypes in secondary education using a novel cluster-based analysis

Díez, José-Luis; Ramos, Amparo; Candela, Carlos

doi:10.1007/s10798-022-09746-1

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…• gender stereotypes (Diez et al, 2022) • identity (Cribbs et al, 2021;Mica et al, 2018) • interest (Cordero & Frutos, 2015;Gómez et al, 2022;Jensen & Sjaastad, 2013;Jones et al, 2018;Kaleva et al, 2019;Kurban & Cabrera, 2019;Mau et al, 2021;Palmer et al, 2017;Sáinz & Müller, 2018;Smith, 2022;Taskinen et al, 2013;VanMeter-Adams et al, 2017;Wang, 2013;Wang et al, 2017;Wyss et al, 2012) • mathematics anxiety (Cribbs et al, 2021) • mathematics self-efficacy (Cordero & Frutos, 2015;Cribbs et al, 2021;Wang 2013b) • self-efficacy (Cordero & Frutos, 2015;Cribbs et al, 2021;Eam et al, 2021;Kurban & Cabrera, 2019;Shin et al, 2017;Tandrayen-Ragoobur & Gokulsing, 2022;Wang 2013b) • motivation (Aeschlimann et al, 2016;Watt et al, 2017),…”

Section: Six Weeksmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…• the influence of gender stereotypes on career choice (Diez et al, 2022) • the key experiences that shaped the academic paths (Smith, 2022) • individual characteristics and social structural factors (Xu, 2017) • participants' STEM motivation (Jensen & Sjaastad, 2013) • perceptions of gender-appropriateness of occupations (Ikonen et al, 2019)…”

Section: Learners' Career Choicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Learners’ career choices in STEM education: A review of empirical studies

Shulga

Zaripova

Sakhieva

et al. 2023

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to systematically review articles on the career choices of learners and STEM. The first goal was to classify research on career choice and STEM to identify trends and gaps in the literature. The second goal was to summarize the findings related to learners’ career choices at STEM and interpret them according to what has been reported in the literature. In this study, the PRISMA method was used to review articles in the educational literature STEM. Sixty-seven articles published in indexed journals in SCOPUS that met the specified criteria were analyzed systematically. The results showed that 51 of 67 articles were involved in the analysis to review by researchers. The results also showed that the earliest article that addressed career choice and STEM was published in 2011, and most of the articles studied were published after 2017. The results also showed that most articles on career choice in STEM were conducted in the United States, Israel, and Spain. The preferred sample groups in research on career choice in STEM fields are mostly high school and undergraduate students. In addition, the studies were broadly classified into five categories, including the effects of STEM activities and the effects on teachers, the effects of some variables on learners’ career choices, the study of learners’ career choices, and parental attitudes. Based on the results obtained from this research, implications are made for future research.

show abstract