2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3886(01)00211-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static charge elimination on pellets in a silo using a new nozzle-type eliminator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Either of the two SS rods was installed in the center of the experimental silo (1.5 m diameter, 2 m high) (Kodama et al, 2002) with two iron support bars (upper and lower), as shown in Fig. 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Either of the two SS rods was installed in the center of the experimental silo (1.5 m diameter, 2 m high) (Kodama et al, 2002) with two iron support bars (upper and lower), as shown in Fig. 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cone discharge, which can be incendiary to a flammable dust cloud, has been extensively studied experimentally and theoretically (Glor, Lüttgens, Maurer, & Post, 1989;Glor & Schwenzfeuer, 1997;Ohsawa, 1999). Preventive methods for a cone discharge, however, are still being developed, although some static chargeneutralizing devices have been introduced (Kodama, Suzuki, Nishimura, Yagi, & Watano, 2002;Kodama, Yamaguma, Suzuki, Mogami, & Watano, 2005;Mogami, Suzuki, Choi, & Yamaguma, 2008;Taillet, 1993). Other conventional methods include suspending a passive discharge wire in a silo (Jones & King, 1991) and fixing a pointed metal rod at the inlet pipe to enhance the corona discharge (van de Weerd, 1974).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the charge on the powder was not completely eliminated, with about 400 V of surface potential remained. It is well known that AC-ionizers have the disadvantage of incomplete charge elimination (Kodama, Suzuki, Nishimura, Yagi, & Watano, 2002). This is mostly because this type of ionizer (3 kV RMS, 20 kHz) produces positive and negative ions from the same emitter point, making the ions close to each other, and leading to their loss through recombination.…”
Section: Apparent Volume Resistivity Of Polymer Powdermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choi et al (2013) has developed a new type of AC electrostatic ionizer, the specific charge obtained by the AC electrostatic ionizer is about 1/8 of that without an AC ionizer. Kodama et al (2002) improved the nozzle‐type static eliminator to eliminate powder static electricity with higher efficiency. Yamaguma et al (2010) proposed to install a grounded metal body in the silo to suppress the generation of powder static electricity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%