2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.101.014311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static fission properties of actinide nuclei

Abstract: Fission barriers heights and excitation energies of superdeformed isomeric minima are calculated within the microscopic -macroscopic Woods -Saxon model for 75 actinide nuclei for which the experimental data are known. State -of -the -art methods were used: minimization over many deformation parameters for minima and the imaginary water flow on many -deformation energy grid for saddles, including nonaxial and reflection-asymmetric shapes. We obtain 0.82 -0.94 MeV rms deviation between the calculated and experim… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
28
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
5
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Presently, many other theoretical predictions performed within these two approaches exist (see Refs. [87][88][89][90] and references therein) and their results are equally valid as those selected in this paper and will not affect the quality of the discussion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Presently, many other theoretical predictions performed within these two approaches exist (see Refs. [87][88][89][90] and references therein) and their results are equally valid as those selected in this paper and will not affect the quality of the discussion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The fission barrier parameters were deduced to be E A = 6.05 ± 0.15 MeV, E B = 5.35 ± 0.15 MeV, hω A = 0.65 MeV and [36]. On the other hand, the present barrier parameters are inconsistent with the PES obtained in the most recent Woods-Saxon microscopic-macroscopic calculations [8]. Other evaluated theoretical results [9,10] show better agreement with our experimental data.…”
Section: On the Fission Barrier Of 238 Npcontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…In recent years, large efforts have been devoted to calculate the potential energy surfaces of the actinides, and to provide a comprehensive set of fission barrier heights and excitation energies of potential minima. These calculations employed a variety of theoretical approaches, such as microscopicmacroscopic models with different parametrization [7][8][9][10][11] as well as relativistic mean-field calculations [12,13]. Most of these calculations resulted in a significant deviation with 0.5-1.5 MeV, furthermore they were inconsistent with the experimental values as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. As a purely phenomenological recipe, the single-particle shell structure, obtained with a static potential, is used and has been found appropriate for providing the required microscopic corrections [22,44,45,[53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, they are still indispensable tools for heavy and superheavy nuclei research, including not only bulk properties but also dynamical processes like fusion and fission reactions. The nuclear ground-state masses and deformations, actinide fission-barrier heights, spontaneous fission half-lives, fission-fragment charge yields, electron capture (EC) delayed fission and some prompt neutron-capture data were successfully described within the Mic-Mac approach [44,45,[53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%