2020
DOI: 10.1029/2019jd031954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Characteristics of Raindrop Size Distributions and Parameters in Central China During the Meiyu Seasons

Abstract: The rain parameters derived from the laser OTT second-generation Particle Size Velocity (Parsivel 2), the two-dimensional video disdrometer (2DVD), and DZZ5 tipping-bucket rain gauge (RG) during the Integrative Monsoon Frontal Rainfall Experiment (IMFRE) in summer 2018 are compared. The total rainfall amounts observed by Parsivel, 2DVD, and RG during IMFRE were 178.07, 176.76, and 182.5 mm, while their total rainy hours were 113, 113, and 90. The mean D m (mass-weighted mean diameter) and LWC (liquid water con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
16
3
Order By: Relevance
“…So the second peak of 10 in Mount Lushan can be affected jiontly by shallow rain as well as the elevation of mountain topography. Moreover, the first peak in the present study differs from some Meiyu studies (Fu et al, 2020;Wen et al, 2016). The higher standard deviation and skewness also indicate significantly higher RSD variability s in Mount Lushan during the Meiyu season.…”
Section: Differences Between Stratiform and Convective Rains In Meiyu A Classification Of Stratiform And Convective Rainscontrasting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…So the second peak of 10 in Mount Lushan can be affected jiontly by shallow rain as well as the elevation of mountain topography. Moreover, the first peak in the present study differs from some Meiyu studies (Fu et al, 2020;Wen et al, 2016). The higher standard deviation and skewness also indicate significantly higher RSD variability s in Mount Lushan during the Meiyu season.…”
Section: Differences Between Stratiform and Convective Rains In Meiyu A Classification Of Stratiform And Convective Rainscontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…Furthermore, the frequency of 10 exhibits a second peak. This was also reported and attributed to shallow rain by Wen et al (2016) and Fu et al (2020). In the present study, the elevation of Mount Lushan will result in insufficient coalenscence and thus reduce the concentration of large raindrop.…”
Section: Differences Between Stratiform and Convective Rains In Meiyu A Classification Of Stratiform And Convective Rainssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The DSD data set then was classified into two categories, convective and stratiform rainfall types. The classification of rain types in this study was mainly based on disdrometer data using the method described by Bringi et al [45] and adopted in many studies [45,46]. Therefore, for at least 10 consecutive oneminute rain samples, if the average rainfall rate was >0.5 mm/h and the standard deviation was <1.5 mm/h, then the sample was classified as stratiform rain; if the average rainfall rate was >5 mm/h and the standard deviation was >1.5 mm/h, then it was classified as convective rain.…”
Section: Rainfall Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applications of optical disdrometers can be traced back over several decades, e.g., field measurements in Barcelona between January 1994 and December 1995 (Cerro et al, 1998). Some recent studies using the optical type of disdrometers to study DSD and estimating rainfall erosivity include, among others, a study at Palermo, Sicily, in the periods 2006-2012 (Carollo and Ferro, 2015) and 2006(Carollo et al, 2016, in the Lazio region in central Italy in the period June 2010-April 2015 (Mineo et al, 2019), in Cherrapunji in Northeast India from May to October 2017 (Murata et al, 2020), and in Central China in summer 2018 (Fu et al, 2020). Not many studies have evaluated disdrometer data not only as point measurements but rather in terms of spatial variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%