2015 IEEE MTT-S International Conference on Numerical Electromagnetic and Multiphysics Modeling and Optimization (NEMO) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/nemo.2015.7415027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical design centering of RF cavity linear accelerator via non-derivative trust region optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In (6), Bk(x) is a symmetric part of the kth bandwidth, i.e., Bk(x) = 2min{f0k -f1k(x), f2k(x) -f0k} with f1k and f2k being the frequencies corresponding to -10 dB level of |S11| (left-and right-hand-side ends of the kth resonance). Note that both (6) and 7are formulated in a minimax sense, i.e., the improvement of the worst case, the bandwidth in (6) and the reflection levels at the operating frequencies in (7). It should be reiterated that particular formulations of the problems (6) and (7) are motivated by the need for identifying the directions corresponding to possibly large change of the antenna responses at and around its operating frequencies.…”
Section: Yield Optimization Using Performance-driven Surrogatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In (6), Bk(x) is a symmetric part of the kth bandwidth, i.e., Bk(x) = 2min{f0k -f1k(x), f2k(x) -f0k} with f1k and f2k being the frequencies corresponding to -10 dB level of |S11| (left-and right-hand-side ends of the kth resonance). Note that both (6) and 7are formulated in a minimax sense, i.e., the improvement of the worst case, the bandwidth in (6) and the reflection levels at the operating frequencies in (7). It should be reiterated that particular formulations of the problems (6) and (7) are motivated by the need for identifying the directions corresponding to possibly large change of the antenna responses at and around its operating frequencies.…”
Section: Yield Optimization Using Performance-driven Surrogatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that both (6) and 7are formulated in a minimax sense, i.e., the improvement of the worst case, the bandwidth in (6) and the reflection levels at the operating frequencies in (7). It should be reiterated that particular formulations of the problems (6) and (7) are motivated by the need for identifying the directions corresponding to possibly large change of the antenna responses at and around its operating frequencies. They do not need to coincide with the formulation of the original design problem used to generate the nominal design of the antenna of interest.…”
Section: Yield Optimization Using Performance-driven Surrogatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, quantification of such effects and, eventually, reducing them already at the design stage is essential to ensure the structure robustness. 3,4 The latter normally means diminishing statistical moments of the system outputs, especially their variance. 5 However, for microwave components, design specifications are often expressed in a minimax form, that is, using upper/lower bounds for the selected figures of interest (eg, maximum acceptable level of reflection, minimum acceptable bandwidth, maximum acceptable power split error, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…leads to topologically complex structures that can be neither developed nor optimized using simpler (analytical or equivalent network) models. Yet, EM-driven parameter tuning but also other tasks that require a large number of antenna simulations (uncertainty quantification [11], robust design [12]) may incur considerable computational expenses. Reduction of these costs has been the focus of extensive research, resulting in various methods such as incorporation of adjoints sensitivities into gradient-based optimization procedures [13], expedited optimization using sparse sensitivity updates [14], [15], utilization of machine learning methods (typically in the context of global optimization) [16], or surrogate-assisted frameworks involving both data-driven [17], [18] and The associate editor coordinating the review of this manuscript and approving it for publication was Haiwen Liu .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%