2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.09.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical interpretation of spatially varying 2D geo-data from sparse measurements using Bayesian compressive sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2D Bayesian compressive sampling (BCS) is another key module in the proposed framework for interpolating sparse SPT measurement data along vertical and horizontal directions simultaneously (e.g., Zhao et al 2018), as described in the following section.…”
Section: Random Field Simulation Of Typical Site Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2D Bayesian compressive sampling (BCS) is another key module in the proposed framework for interpolating sparse SPT measurement data along vertical and horizontal directions simultaneously (e.g., Zhao et al 2018), as described in the following section.…”
Section: Random Field Simulation Of Typical Site Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2D BCS is a novel sampling method in signal or image processing which integrates Bayesian formulation with compressive sampling (CS) in a two-dimensional space (e.g., Ji et al 2008Ji et al , 2009Huang et al 2014;Zhao 2016, 2017). In geotechnical engineering, 2D BCS has been used for interpretation of spatial varying 2D geo-data from sparse measurement (e.g., Zhao et al 2018). Let a matrix F represents the spatial variation of SPT data (i.e., 2D…”
Section: D Bayesian Compressive Sampling (Bcs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior knowledge relevant to the unknown quasi-static profile is obtained from quasi-static CPTu measurements previously acquired in the same offshore area -although at significant distances, i.e., unpaired with the dynamic CPTu that is being transformed. Manipulation and treatment of that information takes place in the frequency domain, using a discrete cosine transform function (i.e., DCT) (Candès et al 2006;Zhao et al 2018;Zhao et al 2020). This avoids the problems of local spatial biases that might be caused by the sharp irregularities that -due to local heterogeneity-are pervasive in CPTu traces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem can be to some extent addressed using cross-validations, as shown in Lark et al (2013), but the results highly depend on the employed testing data and the quantified uncertainty may not be reliable when the testing data are limited. The statistical interpolation methods include the coupled Markov chain method (Qi et al 2016;Li et al 2019;Liu et al 2020), Markov random field method , Bayesian compressive sampling method Zhao 2016, 2017;Zhao, Hu, and Wang 2018), random field method (Gong et al 2020;Zhao et al 2021), geostatistical methods such as kriging and conditional random field method (Qi et al 2019(Qi et al , 2021a. The coupled Markov chain method can characterize the geological uncertainty using limited borehole data, but it can only be used when the transition of geological types has a Markovian property.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%