2022
DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2021.0406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Methods for Microbiome Compositional Data Network Inference: A Survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the driving force behind this remodeling remains unknown, and it may be due to the relative abundance changes in individual species or the disturbed balance of the whole gut flora. Additionally, the interpretation of the network analysis result is not always direct and straightforward; no gold standard comparison methodology has existed yet [ 79 , 80 , 81 ]. Nonetheless, it does not undermine the observed distinction of a co-occurrence network between psoriasis and the apparent normal group and partial restoration of gut dysbiosis in psoriasis after taking 8 weeks of oral probiotics [ 79 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the driving force behind this remodeling remains unknown, and it may be due to the relative abundance changes in individual species or the disturbed balance of the whole gut flora. Additionally, the interpretation of the network analysis result is not always direct and straightforward; no gold standard comparison methodology has existed yet [ 79 , 80 , 81 ]. Nonetheless, it does not undermine the observed distinction of a co-occurrence network between psoriasis and the apparent normal group and partial restoration of gut dysbiosis in psoriasis after taking 8 weeks of oral probiotics [ 79 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microbiota data are compositional [i.e., describe relationships between components that are not independent and have an arbitrary sum (Quinn et al, 2018)], sparse [i.e., having excessive zero counts (Hu et al, 2018)], and high dimensional [(i.e., with a larger number of features per sample (Hernańdez Medina et al, 2022)], and, as such, require special treatment. For specifics on how to deal with microbiota data, the reader is referred to other publications (e.g., Chen et al, 2022;Lin and Peddada, 2020;Galloway-Peña and Hanson, 2020). Although a detailed discussion of this issue is out of the scope of the present editorial, we will refer to two examples in which methodological choice has a big impact on data interpretation.…”
Section: The Epistemological Challengementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a longitudinal approach may help detect correlations across data types that are influenced by a delay of time (Chen et al, 2022). Signal transduction and decoding among host and microorganisms may be time-consuming (Pan, 2021;Xiao et al, 2022) as can the delay between transcriptional shifts and downstream changes affecting the biosynthesis of proteins and metabolites in the host (Jamil et al, 2020).…”
Section: Experimental Setups Of Holo-omics Studies In Microbial Horti...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure is not simple since metabarcoding data are always compositional and can be skewed by amplification and sequencing abnormalities (Arribas et al, 2022). SparCC (Chen et al, 2022) was one of the methods used for estimating interaction networks from relative sequence counts. SparCC avoided the compositional effect by obtaining correlation using log-transformed components.…”
Section: Big Data Integration and Computational Tools Used In Holo-omicsmentioning
confidence: 99%